PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUTS.TO vs. CWIN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HUTS.TO vs. CWIN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF (HUTS.TO) and HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUTS.TO achieves a 18.77% return, which is significantly higher than CWIN.TO's 15.75% return.


HUTS.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
5.42%
YTD
18.77%
6M
17.55%
1Y
33.45%
3Y*
13.29%
5Y*
10Y*

CWIN.TO

1D
0.99%
1M
4.14%
YTD
15.75%
6M
18.53%
1Y
32.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUTS.TO vs. CWIN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HUTS.TO and CWIN.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUTS.TO vs. CWIN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUTS.TO
HUTS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HUTS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUTS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUTS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HUTS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUTS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

CWIN.TO
CWIN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CWIN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWIN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWIN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CWIN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWIN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUTS.TO vs. CWIN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF (HUTS.TO) and HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUTS.TOCWIN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.51

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.75

4.57

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.05

16.73

+1.32

HUTS.TO vs. CWIN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUTS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.56, which is higher than the CWIN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUTS.TO and CWIN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HUTS.TOCWIN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.56

2.69

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

2.30

-1.78

Drawdowns

HUTS.TO vs. CWIN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUTS.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.57%, which is greater than CWIN.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTS.TO and CWIN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUTS.TOCWIN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.57%

-10.87%

-19.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.84%

-7.15%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-0.38%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.07%

-1.43%

-8.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.96%

-0.10%

Volatility

HUTS.TO vs. CWIN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF (HUTS.TO) is 2.93%, while HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that HUTS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWIN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUTS.TOCWIN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

3.52%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

9.69%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.45%

12.16%

-2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.01%

13.89%

+1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.01%

13.89%

+1.12%

HUTS.TO vs. CWIN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUTS.TO has a 2.06% expense ratio, which is higher than CWIN.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

HUTS.TO vs. CWIN.TO - Dividend Comparison

HUTS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, more than CWIN.TO's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CWIN.TO
HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units
3.19%3.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HUTS.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF
5.50%6.45%7.45%7.83%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


HUTS.TO and CWIN.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CWIN.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CWIN.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 2.06% for HUTS.TO.

HUTS.TO is categorized as Utilities Equities, while CWIN.TO is Dividend. HUTS.TO tracks Solactive Canadian Utility Services High Dividend Index TR, while CWIN.TO tracks Solactive Canada Dividend Elite Champions Index. Their fees differ too: 2.06% for HUTS.TO and 0.65% for CWIN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUTS.TO and CWIN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer