PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUTS.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HUTS.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF (HUTS.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (USD) (HYLD-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HUTS.TO is traded in CAD, while HYLD-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HYLD-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUTS.TO achieves a 18.77% return, which is significantly higher than HYLD-U.TO's 16.59% return.


HUTS.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
5.42%
YTD
18.77%
6M
17.55%
1Y
33.45%
3Y*
13.29%
5Y*
10Y*

HYLD-U.TO

1D
0.24%
1M
11.64%
YTD
16.59%
6M
14.32%
1Y
39.69%
3Y*
23.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUTS.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HUTS.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF
18.77%21.29%9.40%-3.91%-12.80%
HYLD-U.TO
Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (USD)
16.59%14.33%34.31%14.81%1.94%

Correlation

The correlation between HUTS.TO and HYLD-U.TO is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2022

0.18

The correlation between HUTS.TO and HYLD-U.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HUTS.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HUTS.TO
HYLD-U.TO

Utilities

41.3%
2.4%

Energy

35.1%
4.9%

Communication Services

23.6%
11.3%

Basic Materials

-

5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.4%

Financial Services

-

12.4%

Healthcare

-

9.8%

Industrials

-

5.0%

Real Estate

-

3.8%

Technology

-

33.9%

Utilities

HUTS.TO
41.3%
HYLD-U.TO
2.4%

Energy

HUTS.TO
35.1%
HYLD-U.TO
4.9%

Communication Services

HUTS.TO
23.6%
HYLD-U.TO
11.3%

Basic Materials

HUTS.TO

-

HYLD-U.TO
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

HUTS.TO

-

HYLD-U.TO
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

HUTS.TO

-

HYLD-U.TO
3.4%

Financial Services

HUTS.TO

-

HYLD-U.TO
12.4%

Healthcare

HUTS.TO

-

HYLD-U.TO
9.8%

Industrials

HUTS.TO

-

HYLD-U.TO
5.0%

Real Estate

HUTS.TO

-

HYLD-U.TO
3.8%

Technology

HUTS.TO

-

HYLD-U.TO
33.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUTS.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUTS.TO
HUTS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HUTS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUTS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUTS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HUTS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUTS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

HYLD-U.TO
HYLD-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
HYLD-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLD-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLD-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLD-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLD-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUTS.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF (HUTS.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (USD) (HYLD-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUTS.TOHYLD-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.49

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.75

3.28

+2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.05

11.78

+6.27

HUTS.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUTS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.56, which is higher than the HYLD-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUTS.TO and HYLD-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HUTS.TOHYLD-U.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.56

2.73

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.79

-0.27

Drawdowns

HUTS.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUTS.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.57%, which is greater than HYLD-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -24.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTS.TO and HYLD-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUTS.TOHYLD-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.57%

-24.30%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.84%

-12.17%

+6.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.04%

-23.36%

+1.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

0.00%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.07%

-7.49%

-2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

3.38%

-1.52%

Volatility

HUTS.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF (HUTS.TO) is 2.93%, while Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (USD) (HYLD-U.TO) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that HUTS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYLD-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUTS.TOHYLD-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

4.24%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.75%

11.38%

-3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.45%

14.62%

-5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.01%

17.91%

-2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.01%

17.91%

-2.90%

Dividends

HUTS.TO vs. HYLD-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

HUTS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, less than HYLD-U.TO's 7.57% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HUTS.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Utilities ETF
5.50%6.45%7.45%7.83%2.33%
HYLD-U.TO
Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (USD)
7.57%8.06%8.49%8.82%9.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


HUTS.TO and HYLD-U.TO have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUTS.TO is categorized as Utilities Equities, while HYLD-U.TO is Derivative Income.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUTS.TO and HYLD-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer