HUTG vs. TQQQ
HUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds - HUTG tracks the Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HUTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
HUTG vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HUTG
- 1D
- -7.85%
- 1M
- -30.20%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQQ
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 38.69%
- YTD
- 46.69%
- 1Y
- 85.21%
- 3Y*
- 57.92%
- 5Y*
- 20.15%
- 10Y*
- 43.22%
HUTG vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF | 47.66% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 38.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUTG and TQQQ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUTG vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
HUTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TQQQ
HUTG vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF (HUTG) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUTG | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUTG vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUTG drawdown since its inception was -66.30%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTG and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUTG | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.30% | -81.66% | +15.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -58.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.12% | -11.48% | -35.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.55% | -18.48% | -9.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.97% | — |
Volatility
HUTG vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUTG | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 25.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 45.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 212.66% | 54.89% | +157.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 212.66% | 67.67% | +144.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 212.66% | 66.35% | +146.31% |
HUTG vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
HUTG vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
HUTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.49% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUTG and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.00% for HUTG.
HUTG tracks Hut 8 Corp. (HUT), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for HUTG and 0.95% for TQQQ.
Find the right allocation for HUTG and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer