HUTE.TO vs. ZPW.TO

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

HUTE.TO (Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF) and ZPW.TO (BMO US Put Write ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HUTE.TO returned 17.01%/yr vs 11.60%/yr for ZPW.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HUTE.TO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ZPW.TO.

Performance

HUTE.TO vs. ZPW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) and BMO US Put Write ETF (ZPW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUTE.TO achieves a 13.61% return, which is significantly higher than ZPW.TO's 5.69% return.

HUTE.TO

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -1.43%
• 6M: 14.34%
• YTD: 13.61%
• 1Y: 18.91%
• 3Y*: 17.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZPW.TO

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 2.76%
• 6M: 4.49%
• YTD: 5.69%
• 1Y: 11.62%
• 3Y*: 11.60%
• 5Y*: 9.15%
• 10Y*: 6.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUTE.TO vs. ZPW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF	13.61%	19.04%	18.16%	0.10%	0.94%
ZPW.TO BMO US Put Write ETF	5.69%	6.40%	13.88%	21.83%	1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HUTE.TO and ZPW.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2022	0.08

HUTE.TO vs. ZPW.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HUTE.TO	ZPW.TO
Utilities	40.4%	-
Communication Services	38.2%	9.5%
Energy	18.1%	-
Industrials	3.3%	9.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	13.6%
Financial Services	-	16.0%
Healthcare	-	14.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	35.8%

Return for Risk

HUTE.TO vs. ZPW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUTE.TO

HUTE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 60
HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
HUTE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
HUTE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 57
HUTE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
HUTE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

ZPW.TO

ZPW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
ZPW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
ZPW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ZPW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 62
ZPW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
ZPW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUTE.TO vs. ZPW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) and BMO US Put Write ETF (ZPW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HUTE.TO	ZPW.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.60	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	2.21	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.30	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	2.08	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.98	5.91	+2.07

HUTE.TO vs. ZPW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUTE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the ZPW.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUTE.TO and ZPW.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HUTE.TO vs. ZPW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUTE.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, smaller than the maximum ZPW.TO drawdown of -23.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUTE.TO and ZPW.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HUTE.TO	ZPW.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.35%	-23.77%	+5.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.85%	-5.61%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.25%	-12.35%	-0.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.57%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.43%	-0.50%	-2.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.92%	-4.05%	+0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	1.98%	+0.40%

Volatility

HUTE.TO vs. ZPW.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF (HUTE.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to BMO US Put Write ETF (ZPW.TO) at 2.89%. This indicates that HUTE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HUTE.TO	ZPW.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.38%	2.89%	+2.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.67%	6.18%	+4.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.33%	7.32%	+5.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.63%	10.62%	+4.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.63%	11.72%	+2.91%

HUTE.TO vs. ZPW.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUTE.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPW.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

HUTE.TO vs. ZPW.TO - Dividend Comparison

HUTE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.25%, less than ZPW.TO's 9.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HUTE.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Enhanced Income ETF	9.25%	9.64%	10.24%	10.72%	1.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZPW.TO BMO US Put Write ETF	9.49%	9.55%	9.18%	7.57%	8.20%	7.24%	7.61%	7.17%	6.61%	6.82%	7.32%	2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HUTE.TO and ZPW.TO in my portfolio?

HUTE.TO and ZPW.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HUTE.TO or ZPW.TO?

On fees, HUTE.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HUTE.TO or ZPW.TO?

HUTE.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ZPW.TO.

What is the main difference between HUTE.TO and ZPW.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Harvest and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HUTE.TO and 0.65% for ZPW.TO.