HUSV vs. CHAT
HUSV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HUSV is a Low Volatility fund actively managed by First Trust, while CHAT is a Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HUSV returned 9.18%/yr vs 40.54%/yr for CHAT. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HUSV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.
Performance
HUSV vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUSV achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 39.01% return.
HUSV
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- 5.12%
- 3Y*
- 9.18%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.05%
CHAT
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- 6M
- 32.64%
- YTD
- 39.01%
- 1Y
- 68.87%
- 3Y*
- 40.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 45.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $58.63M | $57.19M | $67.40M | |
| $1.27M | $680.03K | $388.61K |
HUSV vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HUSV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF | 6.59% | 4.96% | 12.64% | 4.88% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 39.01% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 21.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUSV and CHAT is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.09 |
The correlation between HUSV and CHAT shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.09 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HUSV vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HUSV
CHAT
Industrials
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
Industrials
HUSV
CHAT
Utilities
HUSV
CHAT
-
Financial Services
HUSV
CHAT
Healthcare
HUSV
CHAT
-
Consumer Cyclical
HUSV
CHAT
Technology
HUSV
CHAT
Consumer Defensive
HUSV
CHAT
-
Real Estate
HUSV
CHAT
-
Basic Materials
HUSV
CHAT
-
Energy
HUSV
CHAT
-
Communication Services
HUSV
CHAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUSV vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
HUSV
CHAT
HUSV vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUSV | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.27 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 2.25 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.75 | 7.96 | -6.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUSV vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUSV drawdown since its inception was -35.72%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUSV and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUSV | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.72% | -31.34% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.78% | -28.34% | +21.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.35% | -31.34% | +21.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -21.25% | +19.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -5.73% | +2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 8.01% | -5.09% |
Volatility
HUSV vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) is 4.47%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 16.74%. This indicates that HUSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUSV | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 16.74% | -12.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.70% | 34.39% | -26.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.99% | 39.18% | -29.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 32.41% | -20.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 32.41% | -17.94% |
HUSV vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUSV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HUSV vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
HUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than CHAT's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 2.05% | 2.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HUSV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF | 1.27% | 1.38% | 1.14% | 1.80% | 1.68% | 1.35% | 1.29% | 1.36% | 1.48% | 1.31% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUSV and CHAT have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHAT has higher volatility (16.74%) compared to HUSV (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUSV dropped -35.72% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
On 3-year performance, CHAT leads with 40.54% vs 9.18% for HUSV. On fees, HUSV is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, HUSV has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 40.54% return vs 9.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HUSV is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CHAT.
CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.27% for HUSV.
HUSV is categorized as Low Volatility, while CHAT is Artificial Intelligence. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HUSV and 0.75% for CHAT.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HUSV and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer