HUMDX vs. HWSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX).
HUMDX is managed by Huber Funds. It was launched on Dec 31, 2015. HWSIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Sep 20, 1985.
Performance
HUMDX vs. HWSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HUMDX vs. HWSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMDX Huber Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.34% | 7.65% | 13.40% | 10.56% | -7.13% | 26.51% | -8.19% | 25.70% | -18.40% | 15.04% |
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund | 7.19% | 1.60% | 5.00% | 18.85% | 2.97% | 35.54% | -0.31% | 20.54% | -15.03% | 7.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUMDX achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than HWSIX's 7.19% return. Over the past 10 years, HUMDX has underperformed HWSIX with an annualized return of 7.39%, while HWSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.01% annualized return.
HUMDX
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 16.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.53%
- 5Y*
- 5.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.39%
HWSIX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 5.71%
- 1Y
- 16.85%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HUMDX vs. HWSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUMDX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HWSIX's 1.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HUMDX vs. HWSIX — Risk / Return Rank
HUMDX
HWSIX
HUMDX vs. HWSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUMDX | HWSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 0.73 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.17 | 1.16 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.16 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 0.92 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.48 | 3.44 | +0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUMDX | HWSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 0.73 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.43 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.41 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.44 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between HUMDX and HWSIX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HUMDX vs. HWSIX - Dividend Comparison
HUMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than HWSIX's 0.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMDX Huber Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.76% | 0.76% | 1.02% | 1.14% | 2.01% | 0.95% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 1.16% | 0.61% | 2.34% | 0.00% |
HWSIX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund | 0.94% | 1.01% | 8.35% | 1.90% | 13.44% | 0.36% | 0.80% | 4.89% | 9.84% | 5.07% | 0.41% | 11.78% |
Drawdowns
HUMDX vs. HWSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUMDX drawdown since its inception was -50.39%, smaller than the maximum HWSIX drawdown of -72.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMDX and HWSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUMDX | HWSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.39% | -72.00% | +21.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.19% | -16.44% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.16% | -26.92% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.39% | -53.67% | +3.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.03% | -2.75% | -6.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.00% | -12.12% | +3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 4.42% | -0.27% |
Volatility
HUMDX vs. HWSIX - Volatility Comparison
Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund (HWSIX) at 4.15%. This indicates that HUMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HUMDX | HWSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 4.15% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.82% | 12.90% | -0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.32% | 23.97% | -2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.58% | 21.70% | -1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 24.67% | -2.11% |