PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUMDX vs. HULIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HUMDX vs. HULIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) and Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund (HULIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUMDX achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than HULIX's 5.58% return. Over the past 10 years, HUMDX has underperformed HULIX with an annualized return of 7.86%, while HULIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.32% annualized return.


HUMDX

1D
0.72%
1M
0.51%
YTD
10.58%
6M
17.26%
1Y
30.64%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*
7.86%

HULIX

1D
0.59%
1M
1.44%
YTD
5.58%
6M
7.89%
1Y
16.46%
3Y*
14.77%
5Y*
11.44%
10Y*
12.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUMDX vs. HULIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUMDX
Huber Mid Cap Value Fund
10.58%7.65%13.40%10.56%-7.13%26.51%-8.19%25.70%-18.40%15.04%
HULIX
Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund
5.58%8.99%15.96%19.96%-3.55%32.72%3.47%34.12%-13.79%19.54%

Correlation

The correlation between HUMDX and HULIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.86

The correlation between HUMDX and HULIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUMDX vs. HULIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUMDX
HUMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
HUMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
HUMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

HULIX
HULIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
HULIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HULIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
HULIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
HULIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
HULIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUMDX vs. HULIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) and Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund (HULIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUMDXHULIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.97

1.48

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

2.16

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

2.46

+0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.72

6.71

+3.02

HUMDX vs. HULIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the HULIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUMDX and HULIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HUMDXHULIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

1.48

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.73

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.67

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.38

-0.03

Drawdowns

HUMDX vs. HULIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUMDX drawdown since its inception was -50.39%, smaller than the maximum HULIX drawdown of -70.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMDX and HULIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUMDXHULIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.39%

-70.36%

+19.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-6.82%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-17.14%

-8.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-17.14%

-8.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.39%

-35.41%

-14.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.89%

-10.77%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.50%

+0.63%

Volatility

HUMDX vs. HULIX - Volatility Comparison

Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund (HULIX) at 2.91%. This indicates that HUMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HULIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUMDXHULIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

2.91%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

8.22%

+3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.76%

11.27%

+4.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.47%

15.72%

+4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.53%

18.57%

+3.96%

HUMDX vs. HULIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUMDX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HULIX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

HUMDX vs. HULIX - Dividend Comparison

HUMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than HULIX's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HULIX
Huber Select Large Cap Value Fund
1.11%1.17%0.93%0.74%0.65%0.30%1.72%0.73%1.37%0.64%1.26%1.00%
HUMDX
Huber Mid Cap Value Fund
0.69%0.76%1.02%1.14%2.01%0.95%0.66%0.00%1.16%0.61%2.34%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HUMDX and HULIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HUMDX has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to HULIX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUMDX dropped -50.39% vs HULIX's -70.36%.

HUMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUMDX and HULIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer