HUMDX vs. HWSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX).
HUMDX is managed by Huber Funds. It was launched on Dec 31, 2015. HWSAX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jun 10, 2000.
Performance
HUMDX vs. HWSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HUMDX vs. HWSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMDX Huber Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.26% | 7.65% | 13.40% | 10.56% | -7.13% | 26.51% | -8.19% | 25.70% | -18.40% | 15.04% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 9.00% | 1.38% | 4.77% | 18.56% | 2.81% | 35.32% | -0.50% | 20.26% | -15.23% | 7.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUMDX achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than HWSAX's 9.00% return. Over the past 10 years, HUMDX has underperformed HWSAX with an annualized return of 7.59%, while HWSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.
HUMDX
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 8.06%
- 1Y
- 19.78%
- 3Y*
- 12.23%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
HWSAX
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- 1Y
- 18.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HUMDX vs. HWSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUMDX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HWSAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HUMDX vs. HWSAX — Risk / Return Rank
HUMDX
HWSAX
HUMDX vs. HWSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUMDX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 0.78 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 1.22 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.17 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 1.17 | +0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 4.34 | +0.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUMDX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.78 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.42 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.41 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.47 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between HUMDX and HWSAX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HUMDX vs. HWSAX - Dividend Comparison
HUMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than HWSAX's 0.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMDX Huber Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.75% | 0.76% | 1.02% | 1.14% | 2.01% | 0.95% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 1.16% | 0.61% | 2.34% | 0.00% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 0.64% | 0.69% | 8.19% | 1.79% | 13.39% | 0.22% | 0.63% | 4.62% | 9.45% | 4.80% | 0.00% | 11.67% |
Drawdowns
HUMDX vs. HWSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUMDX drawdown since its inception was -50.39%, smaller than the maximum HWSAX drawdown of -72.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMDX and HWSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUMDX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.39% | -72.14% | +21.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.19% | -16.44% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.16% | -26.98% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.39% | -53.82% | +3.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.28% | -1.09% | -6.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.00% | -11.03% | +2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 4.43% | -0.26% |
Volatility
HUMDX vs. HWSAX - Volatility Comparison
Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) at 4.45%. This indicates that HUMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HUMDX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 4.45% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.94% | 12.99% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.36% | 23.99% | -2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 21.71% | -1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.57% | 24.65% | -2.08% |