HUMDX vs. BSCMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) and Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX).
HUMDX is managed by Huber Funds. It was launched on Dec 31, 2015. BSCMX is managed by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 2, 2018.
Performance
HUMDX vs. BSCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HUMDX vs. BSCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMDX Huber Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.26% | 7.65% | 13.40% | 10.56% | -7.13% | 26.51% | -8.19% | 25.70% | -19.97% |
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 8.18% | 23.51% | 24.77% | 22.75% | -7.89% | 27.61% | 20.38% | 12.82% | -12.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUMDX achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than BSCMX's 8.18% return.
HUMDX
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 8.06%
- 1Y
- 19.78%
- 3Y*
- 12.23%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
BSCMX
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -7.43%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 13.76%
- 1Y
- 42.61%
- 3Y*
- 23.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.29%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HUMDX vs. BSCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUMDX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCMX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HUMDX vs. BSCMX — Risk / Return Rank
HUMDX
BSCMX
HUMDX vs. BSCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) and Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HUMDX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.96 | -1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 2.74 | -1.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.36 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 3.06 | -1.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 12.65 | -8.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HUMDX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.96 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.86 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.66 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between HUMDX and BSCMX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HUMDX vs. BSCMX - Dividend Comparison
HUMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than BSCMX's 4.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUMDX Huber Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.75% | 0.76% | 1.02% | 1.14% | 2.01% | 0.95% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 1.16% | 0.61% | 2.34% |
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 4.20% | 4.54% | 2.31% | 3.50% | 2.93% | 4.38% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 9.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HUMDX vs. BSCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUMDX drawdown since its inception was -50.39%, which is greater than BSCMX's maximum drawdown of -38.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUMDX and BSCMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUMDX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.39% | -38.12% | -12.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.19% | -13.85% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.16% | -22.34% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.28% | -7.43% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.00% | -6.10% | -2.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 3.35% | +0.82% |
Volatility
HUMDX vs. BSCMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Huber Mid Cap Value Fund (HUMDX) is 5.23%, while Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) has a volatility of 5.72%. This indicates that HUMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HUMDX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 5.72% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.94% | 12.37% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.36% | 22.03% | -0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 17.85% | +2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.57% | 20.69% | +1.88% |