BSCMX vs. WFGGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) and WCM Focused Global Growth Fund (WFGGX).
BSCMX is managed by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 2, 2018. WFGGX is managed by WCM Investment Management. It was launched on Jun 27, 2013.
Performance
BSCMX vs. WFGGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSCMX vs. WFGGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 6.39% | 23.51% | 24.77% | 22.75% | -7.89% | 27.61% | 20.38% | 12.82% | -12.23% |
WFGGX WCM Focused Global Growth Fund | -7.73% | 24.09% | 30.71% | 26.13% | -30.75% | 14.62% | 39.10% | 33.46% | -6.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCMX achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly higher than WFGGX's -7.73% return.
BSCMX
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -8.34%
- YTD
- 6.39%
- 6M
- 12.73%
- 1Y
- 40.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.70%
- 5Y*
- 15.23%
- 10Y*
- —
WFGGX
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- -11.60%
- YTD
- -7.73%
- 6M
- -9.04%
- 1Y
- 17.63%
- 3Y*
- 19.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.86%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSCMX vs. WFGGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCMX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than WFGGX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BSCMX vs. WFGGX — Risk / Return Rank
BSCMX
WFGGX
BSCMX vs. WFGGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) and WCM Focused Global Growth Fund (WFGGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCMX | WFGGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 0.86 | +0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.60 | 1.43 | +1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.18 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 0.54 | +2.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | 1.85 | +9.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCMX | WFGGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 0.86 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.46 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.71 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCMX and WFGGX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BSCMX vs. WFGGX - Dividend Comparison
BSCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than WFGGX's 4.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 4.27% | 4.54% | 2.31% | 3.50% | 2.93% | 4.38% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 9.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WFGGX WCM Focused Global Growth Fund | 4.06% | 3.75% | 4.75% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 10.47% | 3.41% | 1.77% | 2.93% | 1.49% | 12.79% | 0.38% |
Drawdowns
BSCMX vs. WFGGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCMX drawdown since its inception was -38.12%, roughly equal to the maximum WFGGX drawdown of -36.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCMX and WFGGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCMX | WFGGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.12% | -36.91% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.85% | -12.62% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.34% | -36.91% | +14.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.97% | -12.62% | +3.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.10% | -6.86% | +0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 5.82% | -2.50% |
Volatility
BSCMX vs. WFGGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) is 5.43%, while WCM Focused Global Growth Fund (WFGGX) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that BSCMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WFGGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSCMX | WFGGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 6.07% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.27% | 14.10% | -1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.02% | 22.84% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 20.12% | -2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 19.03% | +1.66% |