PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUKX.L vs. VMID.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HUKX.L vs. VMID.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) and Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HUKX.L is traded in GBp, while VMID.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VMID.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUKX.L achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly higher than VMID.L's 5.14% return. Over the past 10 years, HUKX.L has outperformed VMID.L with an annualized return of 9.07%, while VMID.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.85% annualized return.


HUKX.L

1D
0.29%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
5.71%
6M
8.70%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
14.79%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
9.07%

VMID.L

1D
0.59%
1M
4.12%
YTD
5.14%
6M
7.30%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*
5.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUKX.L vs. VMID.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUKX.L
HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP
5.71%26.20%9.58%7.36%5.07%17.54%-11.64%17.42%-8.67%12.39%
VMID.L
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing
5.14%12.87%7.42%8.16%-17.36%16.04%-4.93%29.17%-13.15%17.24%

Correlation

The correlation between HUKX.L and VMID.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.74

The correlation between HUKX.L and VMID.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

HUKX.L vs. VMID.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HUKX.L
VMID.L

Financial Services

26.2%
19.4%

Consumer Defensive

13.7%
6.1%

Industrials

13.0%
19.9%

Healthcare

12.9%
4.4%

Energy

10.7%
2.5%

Basic Materials

8.5%
6.6%

Utilities

4.8%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
13.3%

Communication Services

2.3%
5.9%

Real Estate

1.0%
9.4%

Technology

0.3%
9.4%

Financial Services

HUKX.L
26.2%
VMID.L
19.4%

Consumer Defensive

HUKX.L
13.7%
VMID.L
6.1%

Industrials

HUKX.L
13.0%
VMID.L
19.9%

Healthcare

HUKX.L
12.9%
VMID.L
4.4%

Energy

HUKX.L
10.7%
VMID.L
2.5%

Basic Materials

HUKX.L
8.5%
VMID.L
6.6%

Utilities

HUKX.L
4.8%
VMID.L
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

HUKX.L
4.5%
VMID.L
13.3%

Communication Services

HUKX.L
2.3%
VMID.L
5.9%

Real Estate

HUKX.L
1.0%
VMID.L
9.4%

Technology

HUKX.L
0.3%
VMID.L
9.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUKX.L vs. VMID.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUKX.L
HUKX.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HUKX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VMID.L
VMID.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VMID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VMID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUKX.L vs. VMID.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) and Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HUKX.LVMID.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.21

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

1.21

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.21

4.35

+3.86

HUKX.L vs. VMID.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUKX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the VMID.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUKX.L and VMID.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HUKX.LVMID.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.13

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.22

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.35

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.40

+0.14

Drawdowns

HUKX.L vs. VMID.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUKX.L drawdown since its inception was -34.22%, smaller than the maximum VMID.L drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUKX.L and VMID.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUKX.LVMID.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.22%

-41.85%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-11.55%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-15.97%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.95%

-29.51%

+16.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.22%

-41.85%

+7.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.87%

-0.83%

-3.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-7.80%

+3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

3.23%

-0.68%

Volatility

HUKX.L vs. VMID.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) and Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) have volatilities of 3.90% and 3.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUKX.LVMID.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

3.80%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

10.23%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.82%

12.41%

-1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.65%

15.18%

-2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.96%

16.53%

-1.57%

HUKX.L vs. VMID.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUKX.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VMID.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HUKX.L vs. VMID.L - Dividend Comparison

HUKX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than VMID.L's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HUKX.L
HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP
2.85%2.95%3.74%3.50%3.63%3.19%4.04%4.31%4.35%3.79%3.49%3.79%
VMID.L
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing
3.65%3.90%3.30%3.41%3.30%2.55%2.08%2.82%3.59%3.19%3.08%3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


HUKX.L and VMID.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HUKX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HUKX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VMID.L.

HUKX.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while VMID.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for HUKX.L and 0.10% for VMID.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUKX.L and VMID.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer