HUKX.L vs. HSPD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) and HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPD.L).
HUKX.L and HSPD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HUKX.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. It was launched on Aug 24, 2009. HSPD.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on May 14, 2010. Both HUKX.L and HSPD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HUKX.L or HSPD.L.
Key characteristics
| HUKX.L | HSPD.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.95% | 18.61% |
| 1Y Return | 11.66% | 28.81% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.71% | 9.61% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.01% | 14.93% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 5.69% | 12.50% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.07 | 2.28 |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.98% | 12.30% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.22% | -34.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.44% | -0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUKX.L and HSPD.L is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
HUKX.L vs. HSPD.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, HUKX.L achieves a 9.95% return, which is significantly lower than HSPD.L's 18.61% return. Over the past 10 years, HUKX.L has underperformed HSPD.L with an annualized return of 5.69%, while HSPD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.50% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HUKX.L vs. HSPD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HUKX.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HSPD.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HUKX.L vs. HSPD.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) and HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HUKX.L vs. HSPD.L - Dividend Comparison
HUKX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than HSPD.L's 1.05% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUKX.L HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP | 3.73% | 3.50% | 3.63% | 3.19% | 4.04% | 4.31% | 4.35% | 3.79% | 3.49% | 3.79% | 3.25% | 3.24% |
HSPD.L HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 1.05% | 1.18% | 1.34% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 1.41% | 1.68% | 1.44% | 1.65% | 1.67% | 1.46% | 1.53% |
Drawdowns
HUKX.L vs. HSPD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUKX.L drawdown since its inception was -34.22%, roughly equal to the maximum HSPD.L drawdown of -34.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUKX.L and HSPD.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HUKX.L vs. HSPD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) is 3.64%, while HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPD.L) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that HUKX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSPD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.