PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUKX.L vs. HKOD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HUKX.L vs. HKOD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) and HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HKOD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HUKX.L is traded in GBp, while HKOD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HKOD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUKX.L achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly lower than HKOD.L's 66.85% return. Over the past 10 years, HUKX.L has underperformed HKOD.L with an annualized return of 8.60%, while HKOD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.87% annualized return.


HUKX.L

1D
0.28%
1M
0.93%
6M
4.93%
YTD
8.17%
1Y
21.16%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
12.54%
10Y*
8.60%

HKOD.L

1D
-1.24%
1M
-24.00%
6M
44.74%
YTD
66.85%
1Y
133.51%
3Y*
35.37%
5Y*
14.72%
10Y*
13.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUKX.L vs. HKOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUKX.L
HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP
8.17%26.20%9.58%7.36%5.07%17.54%-11.64%17.42%-8.67%12.39%
HKOD.L
HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
66.85%85.32%-21.55%13.96%-19.93%-7.62%40.82%6.43%-16.38%33.19%

Correlation

The correlation between HUKX.L and HKOD.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2011

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between HUKX.L and HKOD.L has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUKX.L vs. HKOD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUKX.L
HUKX.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
HUKX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

HKOD.L
HKOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HKOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUKX.L vs. HKOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) and HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HKOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HUKX.LHKOD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.45

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

4.91

-2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.72

16.70

-8.98

HUKX.L vs. HKOD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUKX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the HKOD.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUKX.L and HKOD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HUKX.L vs. HKOD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUKX.L drawdown since its inception was -34.22%, smaller than the maximum HKOD.L drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUKX.L and HKOD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUKX.LHKOD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.22%

-44.38%

+10.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-27.02%

+18.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-29.12%

+16.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.95%

-39.35%

+26.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.22%

-44.38%

+10.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-27.02%

+25.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.35%

-15.51%

+11.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

7.96%

-5.23%

Volatility

HUKX.L vs. HKOD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) is 2.94%, while HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HKOD.L) has a volatility of 19.45%. This indicates that HUKX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HKOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUKX.LHKOD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

19.45%

-16.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

40.17%

-30.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.20%

44.01%

-32.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.63%

28.08%

-15.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.77%

26.00%

-11.23%

HUKX.L vs. HKOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HUKX.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HKOD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HUKX.L vs. HKOD.L - Dividend Comparison

HUKX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than HKOD.L's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HKOD.L
HSBC MSCI Korea Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.44%0.68%1.54%1.08%0.72%0.61%0.02%0.29%0.56%0.10%0.00%0.00%
HUKX.L
HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP
2.79%2.95%3.74%3.50%3.63%3.19%4.04%4.31%4.35%3.79%3.49%3.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


HUKX.L and HKOD.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HUKX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HUKX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HKOD.L.

HUKX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while HKOD.L is Korea Equity. HUKX.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while HKOD.L tracks MSCI Korea Capped Net Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for HUKX.L and 0.50% for HKOD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUKX.L and HKOD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer