HKOD.L vs. WNRG.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HKOD.L (HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF) and WNRG.L (State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - HKOD.L tracks the HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF while WNRG.L tracks the State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HKOD.L returned 14.34%/yr vs 8.57%/yr for WNRG.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HKOD.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for WNRG.L.

Performance

HKOD.L vs. WNRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (WNRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HKOD.L achieves a 70.37% return, which is significantly higher than WNRG.L's 25.26% return. Over the past 10 years, HKOD.L has outperformed WNRG.L with an annualized return of 14.34%, while WNRG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.57% annualized return.

HKOD.L

• 1D: -1.67%
• 1M: -20.60%
• 6M: 52.67%
• YTD: 70.37%
• 1Y: 138.83%
• 3Y*: 37.85%
• 5Y*: 14.71%
• 10Y*: 14.34%

WNRG.L

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 1.22%
• 6M: 19.05%
• YTD: 25.26%
• 1Y: 33.56%
• 3Y*: 16.08%
• 5Y*: 20.08%
• 10Y*: 8.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HKOD.L vs. WNRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HKOD.L HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF	70.37%	99.54%	-22.90%	19.95%	-28.44%	-8.49%	45.08%	10.64%	-21.06%	45.79%
WNRG.L State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF	25.26%	14.83%	2.07%	3.52%	46.61%	38.74%	-30.35%	9.89%	-14.99%	4.80%

Correlation

The correlation between HKOD.L and WNRG.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2011	0.39

The correlation between HKOD.L and WNRG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HKOD.L vs. WNRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HKOD.L

HKOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 92
HKOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
HKOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
HKOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 90
HKOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
HKOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 92

WNRG.L

WNRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
WNRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
WNRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 58
WNRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
WNRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HKOD.L vs. WNRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (WNRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HKOD.L	WNRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.07	1.67	+1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	2.17	+1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.29	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.77	2.14	+3.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.93	6.18	+11.75

HKOD.L vs. WNRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HKOD.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the WNRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HKOD.L and WNRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HKOD.L vs. WNRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HKOD.L drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, smaller than the maximum WNRG.L drawdown of -68.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HKOD.L and WNRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HKOD.L	WNRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.54%	-68.72%	+18.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.00%	-15.98%	-8.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.48%	-18.94%	-10.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.65%	-26.55%	-21.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.54%	-63.92%	+13.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.00%	-9.97%	-14.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.79%	-17.54%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.75%	5.55%	+2.20%

Volatility

HKOD.L vs. WNRG.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L) has a higher volatility of 20.20% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (WNRG.L) at 6.79%. This indicates that HKOD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HKOD.L	WNRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.20%	6.79%	+13.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.23%	17.77%	+23.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.10%	20.58%	+24.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.74%	24.34%	+5.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.96%	33.35%	-6.39%

HKOD.L vs. WNRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HKOD.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WNRG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

HKOD.L vs. WNRG.L - Dividend Comparison

HKOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while WNRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HKOD.L HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF	0.43%	0.68%	1.54%	1.08%	0.72%	0.61%	0.02%	0.29%	0.56%	0.10%
WNRG.L State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HKOD.L and WNRG.L in my portfolio?

HKOD.L and WNRG.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HKOD.L or WNRG.L?

On fees, WNRG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HKOD.L or WNRG.L?

WNRG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HKOD.L.

What is the main difference between HKOD.L and WNRG.L?

HKOD.L tracks HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF, while WNRG.L tracks State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HKOD.L and 0.30% for WNRG.L.