HUBL.TO vs. BNKL.TO
HUBL.TO (Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF) and BNKL.TO (Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. HUBL.TO is actively managed, while BNKL.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HUBL.TO returned 23.98%/yr vs 46.65%/yr for BNKL.TO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HUBL.TO vs. BNKL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HUBL.TO achieves a 12.99% return, which is significantly lower than BNKL.TO's 45.84% return.
HUBL.TO
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 6.45%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- YTD
- 12.99%
- 1Y
- 27.08%
- 3Y*
- 23.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- —
BNKL.TO
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 44.80%
- YTD
- 45.84%
- 1Y
- 98.77%
- 3Y*
- 46.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HUBL.TO vs. BNKL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HUBL.TO Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF | 12.99% | 17.04% | 30.19% | 9.57% |
BNKL.TO Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 45.84% | 55.98% | 29.92% | 7.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between HUBL.TO and BNKL.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HUBL.TO vs. BNKL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HUBL.TO
BNKL.TO
HUBL.TO vs. BNKL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF (HUBL.TO) and Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HUBL.TO | BNKL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 2.07 | -0.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 9.21 | -7.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.89 | 39.88 | -35.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HUBL.TO vs. BNKL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HUBL.TO drawdown since its inception was -51.30%, which is greater than BNKL.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBL.TO and BNKL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HUBL.TO | BNKL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.30% | -18.58% | -32.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.47% | -10.79% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.70% | -18.58% | -7.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.05% | -2.96% | -13.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.55% | 2.49% | +3.06% |
Volatility
HUBL.TO vs. BNKL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF (HUBL.TO) is 4.73%, while Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that HUBL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNKL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HUBL.TO | BNKL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 5.21% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.57% | 13.69% | +1.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.66% | 16.06% | +3.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 15.86% | +9.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.95% | 15.86% | +13.09% |
Dividends
HUBL.TO vs. BNKL.TO - Dividend Comparison
HUBL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.68%, more than BNKL.TO's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNKL.TO Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.51% | 3.40% | 4.39% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HUBL.TO Harvest US Bank Leaders Income ETF | 7.68% | 8.32% | 7.78% | 8.87% | 7.40% | 5.83% | 7.13% | 5.84% | 6.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HUBL.TO and BNKL.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Global X.
Find the right allocation for HUBL.TO and BNKL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer