PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNKL.TO vs. BKCL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BNKL.TO vs. BKCL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) and Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (BKCL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BNKL.TO vs. BKCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BNKL.TO
Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
0.85%55.98%29.92%9.73%
BKCL.TO
Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF
-1.56%34.78%20.06%4.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKL.TO achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly higher than BKCL.TO's -1.56% return.


BNKL.TO

1D
2.75%
1M
-5.36%
YTD
0.85%
6M
18.04%
1Y
65.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BKCL.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.08%
YTD
-1.56%
6M
10.30%
1Y
38.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BNKL.TO vs. BKCL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKL.TO has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is lower than BKCL.TO's 1.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BNKL.TO vs. BKCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKL.TO
BNKL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BNKL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

BKCL.TO
BKCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BKCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BKCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKL.TO vs. BKCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) and Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (BKCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNKL.TOBKCL.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.07

2.75

+1.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.99

3.54

+1.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

1.57

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.20

3.99

+2.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.07

16.68

+7.39

BNKL.TO vs. BKCL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.07, which is higher than the BKCL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKL.TO and BKCL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNKL.TOBKCL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07

2.75

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.22

1.62

+0.60

Correlation

The correlation between BNKL.TO and BKCL.TO is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BNKL.TO vs. BKCL.TO - Dividend Comparison

BNKL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than BKCL.TO's 13.14% yield.


TTM202520242023
BNKL.TO
Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
3.16%3.40%4.39%2.79%
BKCL.TO
Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF
13.14%12.60%15.02%7.91%

Drawdowns

BNKL.TO vs. BKCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKL.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, which is greater than BKCL.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKL.TO and BKCL.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BNKL.TOBKCL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.58%

-16.58%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-9.90%

-0.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.04%

-8.94%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-2.79%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.37%

+0.41%

Volatility

BNKL.TO vs. BKCL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.63% compared to Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (BKCL.TO) at 6.03%. This indicates that BNKL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BNKL.TOBKCL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.63%

6.03%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.97%

9.97%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.18%

14.22%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

12.91%

+2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

12.91%

+2.78%