PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNKL.TO vs. HEB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BNKL.TO vs. HEB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) and Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BNKL.TO vs. HEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BNKL.TO
Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
0.85%55.98%29.92%9.73%
HEB.TO
Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF
1.58%44.00%23.58%8.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKL.TO achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than HEB.TO's 1.58% return.


BNKL.TO

1D
2.75%
1M
-5.36%
YTD
0.85%
6M
18.04%
1Y
65.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HEB.TO

1D
2.50%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
1.58%
6M
14.53%
1Y
51.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BNKL.TO vs. HEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKL.TO has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than HEB.TO's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BNKL.TO vs. HEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKL.TO
BNKL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BNKL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNKL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

HEB.TO
HEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
HEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKL.TO vs. HEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) and Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNKL.TOHEB.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.07

3.84

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.99

4.89

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

1.74

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.20

5.92

+0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.07

25.35

-1.28

BNKL.TO vs. HEB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.07, which is comparable to the HEB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKL.TO and HEB.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNKL.TOHEB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07

3.84

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.22

2.01

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between BNKL.TO and HEB.TO is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BNKL.TO vs. HEB.TO - Dividend Comparison

BNKL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than HEB.TO's 2.97% yield.


TTM202520242023
BNKL.TO
Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF
3.16%3.40%4.39%2.79%
HEB.TO
Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF
2.97%3.20%4.24%3.75%

Drawdowns

BNKL.TO vs. HEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKL.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, which is greater than HEB.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKL.TO and HEB.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BNKL.TOHEB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.58%

-14.82%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-8.86%

-1.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.04%

-6.09%

-1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-2.51%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.07%

+0.71%

Volatility

BNKL.TO vs. HEB.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Enhanced Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (BNKL.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.63% compared to Hamilton Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB.TO) at 6.09%. This indicates that BNKL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BNKL.TOHEB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.63%

6.09%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.97%

10.25%

+1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.18%

13.52%

+2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

12.68%

+3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

12.68%

+3.01%