PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HUBB vs. AZZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HUBB vs. AZZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) and AZZ Inc. (AZZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HUBB achieves a 6.28% return, which is significantly lower than AZZ's 40.52% return. Over the past 10 years, HUBB has outperformed AZZ with an annualized return of 18.79%, while AZZ has yielded a comparatively lower 11.24% annualized return.


HUBB

1D
0.37%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
6.28%
6M
1.99%
1Y
22.11%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
22.43%
10Y*
18.79%

AZZ

1D
7.05%
1M
1.38%
YTD
40.52%
6M
37.23%
1Y
63.58%
3Y*
56.52%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HUBB vs. AZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HUBB
Hubbell Incorporated
6.28%7.43%28.94%42.40%15.08%35.60%8.89%52.88%-24.61%18.83%
AZZ
AZZ Inc.
40.52%31.89%42.35%46.82%-26.09%18.10%5.34%15.65%-19.88%-19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between HUBB and AZZ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2015

0.53

The correlation between HUBB and AZZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HUBB:

$25.02B

AZZ:

$4.53B

EPS

HUBB:

$16.89

AZZ:

$10.51

PE Ratio

HUBB:

27.78

AZZ:

14.29

PEG Ratio

HUBB:

1.16

AZZ:

0.10

PS Ratio

HUBB:

4.20

AZZ:

2.75

PB Ratio

HUBB:

6.62

AZZ:

3.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

HUBB:

$6.00B

AZZ:

$1.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HUBB:

$2.13B

AZZ:

$394.96M

EBITDA (TTM)

HUBB:

$1.44B

AZZ:

$564.26M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HUBB vs. AZZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HUBB
HUBB Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
HUBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUBB Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
HUBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUBB Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

AZZ
AZZ Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HUBB vs. AZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) and AZZ Inc. (AZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HUBBAZZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.35

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

3.52

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.40

7.73

-4.33

HUBB vs. AZZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HUBB Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the AZZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HUBB and AZZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HUBB vs. AZZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HUBB drawdown since its inception was -41.63%, smaller than the maximum AZZ drawdown of -77.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HUBB and AZZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HUBBAZZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.63%

-77.87%

+36.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.36%

-18.16%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.65%

-23.66%

-8.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.65%

-46.23%

+13.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.63%

-68.02%

+26.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.62%

0.00%

-15.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-31.96%

+24.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.51%

8.26%

-1.75%

Volatility

HUBB vs. AZZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is 8.30%, while AZZ Inc. (AZZ) has a volatility of 12.23%. This indicates that HUBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HUBBAZZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.30%

12.23%

-3.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.61%

23.90%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.80%

30.85%

-2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.22%

33.77%

-4.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.79%

35.71%

-6.92%

Dividends

HUBB vs. AZZ - Dividend Comparison

HUBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than AZZ's 0.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AZZ
AZZ Inc.
0.53%0.69%0.83%1.17%1.69%1.23%1.43%1.48%1.68%1.33%0.97%1.08%
HUBB
Hubbell Incorporated
1.19%1.21%1.19%1.39%1.82%1.92%2.37%2.32%3.17%2.12%2.22%0.00%

Financials

HUBB vs. AZZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hubbell Incorporated and AZZ Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.52B
385.10M
(HUBB) Total Revenue
(AZZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HUBB vs. AZZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hubbell Incorporated and AZZ Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
33.3%
22.8%
Portfolio components
HUBB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported a gross profit of 505.30M and revenue of 1.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

AZZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AZZ Inc. reported a gross profit of 87.59M and revenue of 385.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.

HUBB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported an operating income of 263.80M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

AZZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AZZ Inc. reported an operating income of 57.13M and revenue of 385.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.8%.

HUBB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hubbell Incorporated reported a net income of 181.80M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.

AZZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AZZ Inc. reported a net income of 15.93M and revenue of 385.10M, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HUBB and AZZ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AZZ has higher volatility (12.23%) compared to HUBB (8.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HUBB dropped -41.63% vs AZZ's -77.87%.

AZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HUBB and AZZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer