AZZ vs. IESC
AZZ (AZZ Inc.) and IESC (IES Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — AZZ in Electrical Equipment & Parts, IESC in Engineering & Construction. Over the past 10 years, AZZ returned 10.16%/yr vs 48.90%/yr for IESC. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AZZ vs. IESC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AZZ achieves a 35.67% return, which is significantly lower than IESC's 91.39% return. Over the past 10 years, AZZ has underperformed IESC with an annualized return of 10.16%, while IESC has yielded a comparatively higher 48.90% annualized return.
AZZ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- 6M
- 16.99%
- YTD
- 35.67%
- 1Y
- 37.04%
- 3Y*
- 49.18%
- 5Y*
- 23.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.40%
IESC
- 1D
- 30.27%
- 1M
- 13.84%
- 6M
- 95.78%
- YTD
- 91.39%
- 1Y
- 112.48%
- 3Y*
- 134.42%
- 5Y*
- 68.75%
- 10Y*
- 48.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AZZ AZZ Inc. | $43.34M | $50.01M | $43.17M |
| $133.30M | $144.24M | $175.40M |
AZZ vs. IESC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZZ AZZ Inc. | 35.67% | 31.89% | 42.35% | 46.82% | -26.09% | 18.10% | 5.34% | 15.65% | -19.88% | -19.00% |
IESC IES Holdings, Inc. | 91.39% | 93.58% | 153.67% | 122.72% | -29.76% | 9.99% | 79.42% | 65.02% | -9.86% | -9.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between AZZ and IESC is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 1998 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, AZZ and IESC have become more correlated (0.53) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
AZZ:
$4.35B
IESC:
$14.83B
AZZ:
$6.57
IESC:
$27.72
AZZ:
22.02
IESC:
26.86
AZZ:
0.16
IESC:
0.32
AZZ:
2.61
IESC:
3.77
AZZ:
3.17
IESC:
12.23
AZZ:
$1.68B
IESC:
$3.99B
AZZ:
$402.99M
IESC:
$1.03B
AZZ:
$376.83M
IESC:
$582.79M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AZZ vs. IESC — Risk / Return Rank
AZZ
IESC
AZZ vs. IESC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AZZ Inc. (AZZ) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AZZ | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.28 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 3.16 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.88 | 11.65 | -7.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AZZ vs. IESC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZZ drawdown since its inception was -77.87%, smaller than the maximum IESC drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZZ and IESC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZZ | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.87% | -98.78% | +20.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.16% | -35.26% | +17.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.66% | -49.23% | +25.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.23% | -54.22% | +7.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.02% | -54.28% | -13.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.49% | -2.87% | -6.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.87% | -54.78% | +22.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.55% | 9.56% | -1.01% |
Volatility
AZZ vs. IESC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AZZ Inc. (AZZ) is 10.20%, while IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a volatility of 37.94%. This indicates that AZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IESC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AZZ | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.20% | 37.94% | -27.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.19% | 61.10% | -35.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.05% | 73.89% | -41.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.63% | 57.05% | -23.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.82% | 49.51% | -13.69% |
Dividends
AZZ vs. IESC - Dividend Comparison
AZZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while IESC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZZ AZZ Inc. | 0.58% | 0.69% | 0.83% | 1.17% | 1.69% | 1.23% | 1.43% | 1.48% | 1.68% | 1.33% | 0.97% | 1.08% |
IESC IES Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AZZ vs. IESC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AZZ Inc. and IES Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AZZ vs. IESC - Profitability Comparison
AZZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AZZ Inc. reported a gross profit of 112.17M and revenue of 448.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.0%.
IESC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 340.66M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
AZZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AZZ Inc. reported an operating income of 77.03M and revenue of 448.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.2%.
IESC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 178.55M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
AZZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AZZ Inc. reported a net income of 52.01M and revenue of 448.53M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
IESC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 256.13M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 20.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AZZ and IESC have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IESC has higher volatility (37.94%) compared to AZZ (10.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZZ dropped -77.87% vs IESC's -98.78%.
IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AZZ and IESC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer