HTWN.L vs. XCX4.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HTWN.L (HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD) and XCX4.L (Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - HTWN.L is a Taiwan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan NR USD, while XCX4.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Thailand NR THB. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HTWN.L returned 20.04%/yr vs 3.94%/yr for XCX4.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

HTWN.L vs. XCX4.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTWN.L achieves a 59.57% return, which is significantly higher than XCX4.L's 25.38% return. Over the past 10 years, HTWN.L has outperformed XCX4.L with an annualized return of 20.04%, while XCX4.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.94% annualized return.

HTWN.L

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: -4.95%
• 6M: 52.38%
• YTD: 59.57%
• 1Y: 86.03%
• 3Y*: 39.19%
• 5Y*: 21.14%
• 10Y*: 20.04%

XCX4.L

• 1D: -1.72%
• 1M: -3.84%
• 6M: 25.87%
• YTD: 25.38%
• 1Y: 44.82%
• 3Y*: 7.96%
• 5Y*: 5.78%
• 10Y*: 3.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTWN.L vs. XCX4.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HTWN.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD	59.57%	23.15%	27.50%	21.97%	-21.03%	29.44%	32.11%	26.80%	-5.73%	13.90%
XCX4.L Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C	25.38%	0.32%	1.51%	-16.15%	15.60%	0.13%	-13.81%	3.68%	0.70%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between HTWN.L and XCX4.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2011	0.51

The correlation between HTWN.L and XCX4.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HTWN.L vs. XCX4.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HTWN.L	XCX4.L
Technology	83.0%	-
Financial Services	10.1%	10.0%
Basic Materials	1.8%	4.2%
Industrials	1.7%	36.9%
Communication Services	1.3%	12.4%
Consumer Cyclical	0.9%	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	0.7%	7.9%
Healthcare	0.5%	7.5%
Energy	-	13.6%
Real Estate	-	3.2%
Utilities	-	6.8%

Return for Risk

HTWN.L vs. XCX4.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTWN.L

HTWN.L Risk / Return Rank: 95
HTWN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
HTWN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
HTWN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 94
HTWN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
HTWN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 95

XCX4.L

XCX4.L Risk / Return Rank: 80
XCX4.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
XCX4.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
XCX4.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
XCX4.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XCX4.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTWN.L vs. XCX4.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HTWN.L	XCX4.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.34	2.11	+1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.01	2.86	+1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.35	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.33	3.93	+3.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.80	11.87	+9.92

HTWN.L vs. XCX4.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTWN.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.34, which is higher than the XCX4.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTWN.L and XCX4.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HTWN.L vs. XCX4.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTWN.L drawdown since its inception was -32.63%, smaller than the maximum XCX4.L drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTWN.L and XCX4.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HTWN.L	XCX4.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.63%	-98.74%	+66.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.67%	-11.35%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.76%	-28.34%	-1.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.98%	-36.52%	+6.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.98%	-98.74%	+68.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.67%	-6.84%	-4.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.60%	-16.24%	+8.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	3.76%	+0.17%

Volatility

HTWN.L vs. XCX4.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L) has a higher volatility of 11.97% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L) at 7.60%. This indicates that HTWN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCX4.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HTWN.L	XCX4.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.97%	7.60%	+4.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.19%	17.18%	+5.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.63%	21.21%	+4.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.48%	17.63%	+3.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.52%	2,419.84%	-2,399.32%

HTWN.L vs. XCX4.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HTWN.L and XCX4.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

HTWN.L vs. XCX4.L - Dividend Comparison

HTWN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while XCX4.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HTWN.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD	1.02%	1.61%	1.17%	2.79%	3.06%	1.11%	1.79%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	2.32%	2.59%
XCX4.L Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HTWN.L and XCX4.L in my portfolio?

HTWN.L and XCX4.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HTWN.L or XCX4.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HTWN.L or XCX4.L?

HTWN.L and XCX4.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

What is the main difference between HTWN.L and XCX4.L?

HTWN.L is categorized as Taiwan Equities, while XCX4.L is Asia Pacific Equities. HTWN.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD, while XCX4.L tracks MSCI Thailand NR THB. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Xtrackers.