HTWN.L vs. HUKX.L
HTWN.L (HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD) and HUKX.L (HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - HTWN.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan NR USD, while HUKX.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HTWN.L returned 24.32%/yr vs 9.18%/yr for HUKX.L. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HTWN.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for HUKX.L.
Performance
HTWN.L vs. HUKX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTWN.L achieves a 71.35% return, which is significantly higher than HUKX.L's 5.40% return. Over the past 10 years, HTWN.L has outperformed HUKX.L with an annualized return of 24.32%, while HUKX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.18% annualized return.
HTWN.L
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 20.41%
- YTD
- 71.35%
- 6M
- 76.45%
- 1Y
- 124.97%
- 3Y*
- 42.23%
- 5Y*
- 23.93%
- 10Y*
- 24.32%
HUKX.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- 5.40%
- 6M
- 8.09%
- 1Y
- 20.84%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.18%
HTWN.L vs. HUKX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTWN.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD | 71.35% | 23.15% | 27.50% | 21.28% | -20.57% | 29.44% | 31.41% | 29.56% | -2.68% | 15.90% |
HUKX.L HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP | 5.40% | 26.20% | 9.58% | 7.36% | 5.07% | 17.54% | -11.64% | 17.42% | -8.67% | 12.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTWN.L and HUKX.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2011 | 0.31 |
HTWN.L vs. HUKX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HTWN.L
HUKX.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
HTWN.L
HUKX.L
Financial Services
HTWN.L
HUKX.L
Industrials
HTWN.L
HUKX.L
Basic Materials
HTWN.L
HUKX.L
Communication Services
HTWN.L
HUKX.L
Consumer Cyclical
HTWN.L
HUKX.L
Consumer Defensive
HTWN.L
HUKX.L
Healthcare
HTWN.L
HUKX.L
Energy
HTWN.L
-
HUKX.L
Real Estate
HTWN.L
-
HUKX.L
Utilities
HTWN.L
-
HUKX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTWN.L vs. HUKX.L — Risk / Return Rank
HTWN.L
HUKX.L
HTWN.L vs. HUKX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L) and HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HTWN.L | HUKX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.87 | 1.36 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.03 | 2.36 | +11.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.67 | 8.19 | +30.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HTWN.L | HUKX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.49 | 1.92 | +3.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 0.93 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.49 | 0.61 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.53 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
HTWN.L vs. HUKX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTWN.L drawdown since its inception was -31.84%, smaller than the maximum HUKX.L drawdown of -34.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTWN.L and HUKX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTWN.L | HUKX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.84% | -34.22% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.86% | -8.78% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.76% | -12.95% | -16.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.97% | -12.95% | -17.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.97% | -34.22% | +4.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.15% | +4.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -4.37% | -2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 2.54% | +0.68% |
Volatility
HTWN.L vs. HUKX.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (HTWN.L) has a higher volatility of 9.55% compared to HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) at 4.12%. This indicates that HTWN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUKX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTWN.L | HUKX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.55% | 4.12% | +5.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.18% | 9.43% | +8.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.65% | 10.82% | +11.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 12.65% | +8.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 14.96% | +8.45% |
HTWN.L vs. HUKX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTWN.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HUKX.L's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
HTWN.L vs. HUKX.L - Dividend Comparison
HTWN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than HUKX.L's 2.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTWN.L HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD | 0.95% | 1.61% | 1.17% | 2.79% | 3.04% | 1.11% | 1.79% | 2.12% | 2.55% | 2.04% | 2.32% | 2.61% |
HUKX.L HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP | 2.86% | 2.95% | 3.74% | 3.50% | 3.63% | 3.19% | 4.04% | 4.31% | 4.35% | 3.79% | 3.49% | 3.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HTWN.L and HUKX.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HUKX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HUKX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HTWN.L.
HTWN.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while HUKX.L is Europe Equities. HTWN.L tracks MSCI Taiwan NR USD, while HUKX.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HTWN.L and 0.07% for HUKX.L.
Find the right allocation for HTWN.L and HUKX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer