PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTUS vs. MARB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HTUS vs. MARB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HTUS vs. MARB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
-3.85%16.57%25.02%30.11%-13.00%24.29%10.82%
MARB
First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF
0.29%7.02%0.73%2.16%3.89%0.26%-2.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTUS achieves a -3.85% return, which is significantly lower than MARB's 0.29% return.


HTUS

1D
3.72%
1M
-4.31%
YTD
-3.85%
6M
0.02%
1Y
17.12%
3Y*
18.82%
5Y*
13.40%
10Y*
10.99%

MARB

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
0.29%
6M
2.63%
1Y
6.85%
3Y*
3.46%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HTUS vs. MARB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTUS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than MARB's 2.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HTUS vs. MARB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTUS
HTUS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HTUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HTUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

MARB
MARB Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MARB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARB Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MARB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARB Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTUS vs. MARB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HTUSMARBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

1.29

-0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.37

2.00

-0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.33

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

3.13

-2.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.79

21.28

-14.49

HTUS vs. MARB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the MARB Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTUS and MARB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HTUSMARBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

1.29

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.65

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.34

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between HTUS and MARB is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HTUS vs. MARB - Dividend Comparison

HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.37%, more than MARB's 3.01% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
12.37%11.89%17.80%1.18%5.63%7.20%3.77%0.92%8.69%8.29%3.02%
MARB
First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF
3.01%3.01%2.11%2.20%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HTUS vs. MARB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTUS drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, which is greater than MARB's maximum drawdown of -11.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTUS and MARB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HTUSMARBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.50%

-11.99%

-35.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.90%

-2.43%

-15.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.41%

-3.67%

-20.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.29%

-0.24%

-5.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-1.44%

-2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

0.36%

+2.25%

Volatility

HTUS vs. MARB - Volatility Comparison

Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) has a higher volatility of 6.36% compared to First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB) at 1.15%. This indicates that HTUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MARB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HTUSMARBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

1.15%

+5.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

3.17%

+6.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.90%

5.36%

+16.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.99%

4.23%

+14.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.38%

5.64%

+15.74%