PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTUS vs. EHLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HTUS vs. EHLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTUS achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly lower than EHLS's 14.25% return.


HTUS

1D
-1.20%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
8.95%
6M
8.55%
1Y
24.12%
3Y*
20.35%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*
12.20%

EHLS

1D
-0.63%
1M
-1.19%
YTD
14.25%
6M
12.13%
1Y
22.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HTUS vs. EHLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
8.95%16.57%12.30%
EHLS
Even Herd Long Short ETF
14.25%6.67%12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between HTUS and EHLS is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.60

The correlation between HTUS and EHLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTUS vs. EHLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTUS
HTUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HTUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HTUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

EHLS
EHLS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
EHLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHLS Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
EHLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTUS vs. EHLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HTUSEHLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.22

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.45

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.82

7.06

+6.76

HTUS vs. EHLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the EHLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTUS and EHLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HTUS vs. EHLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTUS drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, which is greater than EHLS's maximum drawdown of -18.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTUS and EHLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTUSEHLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.50%

-18.96%

-28.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-9.06%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-2.68%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-4.39%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

3.14%

-1.39%

Volatility

HTUS vs. EHLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) is 4.02%, while Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that HTUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EHLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTUSEHLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

4.57%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.00%

14.56%

-4.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

18.94%

-6.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.09%

19.68%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.49%

19.68%

+1.81%

HTUS vs. EHLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTUS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than EHLS's 1.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

HTUS vs. EHLS - Dividend Comparison

HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.91%, while EHLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EHLS
Even Herd Long Short ETF
0.00%0.00%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HTUS
Hull Tactical US ETF
10.91%11.89%17.80%1.18%5.63%7.20%3.77%0.92%8.69%8.29%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


HTUS and EHLS have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EHLS has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to HTUS (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTUS dropped -47.50% vs EHLS's -18.96%.

On 1-year performance, HTUS leads with 24.12% vs 22.11% for EHLS. On fees, HTUS is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, HTUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HTUS has performed better with a 24.12% return vs 22.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HTUS is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for EHLS.

HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.91%, compared with 0.00% for EHLS.

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and N/A. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HTUS and 1.58% for EHLS.

HTUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTUS and EHLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer