HTUS vs. BFLX
HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) and BFLX (iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HTUS charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BFLX.
Performance
HTUS vs. BFLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HTUS
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 10.17%
- YTD
- 10.92%
- 1Y
- 22.20%
- 3Y*
- 20.07%
- 5Y*
- 14.57%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
BFLX
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HTUS vs. BFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 2.40% |
BFLX iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF | 0.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTUS and BFLX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2026 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTUS vs. BFLX — Risk / Return Rank
HTUS
BFLX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HTUS vs. BFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS) and iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF (BFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HTUS | BFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.43 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HTUS vs. BFLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTUS drawdown since its inception was -47.50%, which is greater than BFLX's maximum drawdown of -3.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTUS and BFLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTUS | BFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.50% | -3.85% | -43.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -2.47% | +1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -1.32% | -2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | — | — |
Volatility
HTUS vs. BFLX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTUS | BFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.48% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.06% | 14.58% | -2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 14.58% | +4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.50% | 14.58% | +6.92% |
HTUS vs. BFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTUS has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BFLX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HTUS vs. BFLX - Dividend Comparison
HTUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.72%, while BFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFLX iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.72% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HTUS and BFLX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BFLX is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BFLX is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HTUS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.72%, compared with 0.00% for BFLX.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for HTUS and 0.40% for BFLX.
Find the right allocation for HTUS and BFLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer