HTO vs. MMM
HTO (H2O America) and MMM (3M Company) are both stocks. HTO operates in Utilities - Regulated Water (Utilities), while MMM operates in Conglomerates (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, HTO returned 6.48%/yr vs 5.05%/yr for MMM. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HTO vs. MMM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTO achieves a 27.22% return, which is significantly higher than MMM's 11.17% return. Over the past 10 years, HTO has outperformed MMM with an annualized return of 6.48%, while MMM has yielded a comparatively lower 5.05% annualized return.
HTO
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 19.76%
- YTD
- 27.22%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- -1.17%
- 5Y*
- 0.27%
- 10Y*
- 6.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.31%
MMM
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 10.20%
- 6M
- 16.21%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 1Y
- 20.34%
- 3Y*
- 27.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.95%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
HTO H2O America | $30.07M | $32.10M | $28.71M |
MMM 3M Company | $851.12M | $623.50M | $620.01M |
HTO vs. MMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTO H2O America | 27.22% | 2.92% | -22.57% | -17.78% | 13.40% | 7.66% | -0.43% | 30.19% | -11.20% | 16.22% |
MMM 3M Company | 11.17% | 26.36% | 46.13% | -3.33% | -29.63% | 4.85% | 2.77% | -4.29% | -16.90% | 34.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTO and MMM is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 1972 | 0.19 |
The correlation between HTO and MMM shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HTO:
$2.57B
MMM:
$90.91B
HTO:
$2.83
MMM:
$5.60
HTO:
21.66
MMM:
31.49
HTO:
2.80
MMM:
3.75
HTO:
1.36
MMM:
31.51
HTO:
$828.50M
MMM:
$25.18B
HTO:
$159.45M
MMM:
$9.92B
HTO:
$461.63M
MMM:
$5.45B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTO vs. MMM — Risk / Return Rank
HTO
MMM
HTO vs. MMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H2O America (HTO) and 3M Company (MMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HTO | MMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.15 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 1.09 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.96 | 2.35 | +4.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HTO vs. MMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTO drawdown since its inception was -54.53%, smaller than the maximum MMM drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTO and MMM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTO | MMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.53% | -59.10% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.26% | -18.77% | +6.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.90% | -20.66% | -12.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.85% | -53.23% | +10.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.85% | -59.10% | +16.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.00% | -3.40% | -15.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.91% | -16.08% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.51% | 8.68% | -4.17% |
Volatility
HTO vs. MMM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for H2O America (HTO) is 6.49%, while 3M Company (MMM) has a volatility of 9.67%. This indicates that HTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTO | MMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 9.67% | -3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.85% | 19.73% | -2.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.80% | 26.96% | -4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.06% | 28.62% | -4.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.52% | 26.71% | +2.81% |
Dividends
HTO vs. MMM - Dividend Comparison
HTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than MMM's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTO H2O America | 2.80% | 3.43% | 3.25% | 2.33% | 1.77% | 1.86% | 1.85% | 1.69% | 2.01% | 1.63% | 1.45% | 2.63% |
MMM 3M Company | 1.71% | 1.82% | 16.27% | 5.49% | 4.97% | 3.33% | 3.36% | 3.26% | 2.86% | 2.00% | 2.49% | 2.72% |
Financials
HTO vs. MMM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H2O America and 3M Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HTO vs. MMM - Profitability Comparison
HTO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, H2O America reported a gross profit of -183.29M and revenue of 210.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -87.1%.
MMM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, 3M Company reported a gross profit of 2.68B and revenue of 6.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.3%.
HTO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, H2O America reported an operating income of 42.75M and revenue of 210.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.
MMM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, 3M Company reported an operating income of 984.00M and revenue of 6.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.
HTO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, H2O America reported a net income of 26.59M and revenue of 210.47M, resulting in a net margin of 12.6%.
MMM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, 3M Company reported a net income of 933.00M and revenue of 6.50B, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HTO and MMM have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMM has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to HTO (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTO dropped -54.53% vs MMM's -59.10%.
HTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HTO and MMM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer