HTDIX vs. GPIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Tactical Dividend and Momentum Fund (HTDIX) and GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX).
HTDIX is managed by Hanlon. It was launched on Sep 8, 2015. GPIFX is managed by GuidePath. It was launched on Aug 30, 2012.
Performance
HTDIX vs. GPIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HTDIX vs. GPIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTDIX Tactical Dividend and Momentum Fund | -3.34% | 12.92% | 18.32% | 12.48% | -15.78% | 17.64% | 4.37% | 14.00% | -5.63% | 14.81% |
GPIFX GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund | -0.45% | 3.69% | 4.22% | 7.13% | -14.14% | 1.17% | 15.17% | 6.64% | -2.48% | 6.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTDIX achieves a -3.34% return, which is significantly lower than GPIFX's -0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, HTDIX has outperformed GPIFX with an annualized return of 6.08%, while GPIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.64% annualized return.
HTDIX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- -3.34%
- 6M
- -2.82%
- 1Y
- 13.07%
- 3Y*
- 13.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 6.08%
GPIFX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 2.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.78%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HTDIX vs. GPIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTDIX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIFX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HTDIX vs. GPIFX — Risk / Return Rank
HTDIX
GPIFX
HTDIX vs. GPIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Dividend and Momentum Fund (HTDIX) and GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HTDIX | GPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.86 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 1.09 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.18 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 0.66 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | 1.88 | +3.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HTDIX | GPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.86 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.05 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.43 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between HTDIX and GPIFX is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HTDIX vs. GPIFX - Dividend Comparison
HTDIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GPIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTDIX Tactical Dividend and Momentum Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 14.07% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.36% | 0.65% | 1.29% | 0.34% |
GPIFX GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund | 4.69% | 5.15% | 5.18% | 4.86% | 1.96% | 3.10% | 2.62% | 3.73% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 1.97% | 1.24% |
Drawdowns
HTDIX vs. GPIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTDIX drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, which is greater than GPIFX's maximum drawdown of -16.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTDIX and GPIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTDIX | GPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.08% | -16.72% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.86% | -3.50% | -8.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.08% | -16.72% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.08% | -16.72% | -1.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.25% | -2.79% | -2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.48% | -4.07% | -1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 1.24% | +1.12% |
Volatility
HTDIX vs. GPIFX - Volatility Comparison
Tactical Dividend and Momentum Fund (HTDIX) has a higher volatility of 2.16% compared to GuidePath Flexible Income Allocation Fund (GPIFX) at 1.29%. This indicates that HTDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HTDIX | GPIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.16% | 1.29% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.11% | 1.75% | +6.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.80% | 2.73% | +14.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.49% | 4.78% | +6.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.14% | 5.31% | +6.83% |