PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTAX vs. PIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HTAX vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HTAX) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTAX achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 39.56% return.


HTAX

1D
-0.09%
1M
-2.59%
6M
1.25%
YTD
2.39%
1Y
7.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.35%

PIT

1D
-0.05%
1M
12.06%
6M
30.88%
YTD
39.56%
1Y
56.01%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$216.86K$121.02K$106.11K
$1.38M$2.80M$3.76M

HTAX vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HTAX and PIT is -0.26, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

-0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HTAX vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HTAX
HTAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
HTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

PIT
PIT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HTAX vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HTAX) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HTAXPITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

3.19

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.78

10.87

-1.08

HTAX vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTAX and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HTAX vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTAX drawdown since its inception was -6.10%, smaller than the maximum PIT drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTAX and PIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HTAXPITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-17.20%

+11.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-17.20%

+14.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.59%

-5.78%

+3.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.66%

-4.27%

+2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

5.05%

-4.24%

Volatility

HTAX vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HTAX) is 1.42%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that HTAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HTAXPITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

6.47%

-5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.59%

19.93%

-16.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.65%

22.30%

-17.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.31%

17.70%

-11.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.31%

17.70%

-11.39%

HTAX vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTAX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

HTAX vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

HTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, less than PIT's 6.39% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HTAX
Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF
4.64%3.67%0.00%0.00%
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
6.39%8.92%3.59%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


HTAX and PIT have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIT has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to HTAX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTAX dropped -6.10% vs PIT's -17.20%.

On 1-year performance, PIT leads with 56.01% vs 7.93% for HTAX. On fees, HTAX is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, HTAX has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PIT has performed better with a 56.01% return vs 7.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HTAX is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 6.39%, compared with 4.64% for HTAX.

HTAX is categorized as High Yield Muni, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Nomura and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HTAX and 0.55% for PIT.

PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HTAX and PIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer