HTAX vs. PIT
HTAX (Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HTAX is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Nomura, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HTAX returned 8.28% vs 39.64% for PIT. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. HTAX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.
Performance
HTAX vs. PIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTAX achieves a 3.94% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 25.62% return.
HTAX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 3.94%
- 6M
- 4.24%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PIT
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -11.78%
- YTD
- 25.62%
- 6M
- 23.58%
- 1Y
- 39.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HTAX vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HTAX Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 3.94% | 0.92% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 25.62% | 17.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTAX and PIT is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTAX vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank
HTAX
PIT
HTAX vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HTAX) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HTAX | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 2.62 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 10.88 | -2.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HTAX vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTAX drawdown since its inception was -6.10%, smaller than the maximum PIT drawdown of -15.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTAX and PIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTAX | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.10% | -15.19% | +9.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.14% | -15.19% | +12.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -15.19% | +14.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.71% | -4.08% | +2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 3.66% | -2.63% |
Volatility
HTAX vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HTAX) is 1.25%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that HTAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTAX | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | 4.72% | -3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.42% | 19.40% | -15.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.67% | 21.66% | -16.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.41% | 17.50% | -11.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.41% | 17.50% | -11.09% |
HTAX vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTAX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
HTAX vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison
HTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than PIT's 7.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HTAX Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 4.46% | 3.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 7.10% | 8.92% | 3.59% | 6.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HTAX and PIT have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIT has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to HTAX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HTAX dropped -6.10% vs PIT's -15.19%.
On 1-year performance, PIT leads with 39.64% vs 8.28% for HTAX. On fees, HTAX is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, HTAX has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PIT has performed better with a 39.64% return vs 8.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTAX is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.
PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.10%, compared with 4.46% for HTAX.
HTAX is categorized as High Yield Muni, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Nomura and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HTAX and 0.55% for PIT.
PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HTAX and PIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer