HTAB vs. VTG
HTAB (Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF) and VTG (Vanguard Total Treasury ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. HTAB is actively managed, while VTG is passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HTAB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTG.
Performance
HTAB vs. VTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HTAB achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than VTG's 0.01% return.
HTAB
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- 0.71%
- 10Y*
- —
VTG
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HTAB vs. VTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF | 1.59% | 4.72% |
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | 0.01% | 2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between HTAB and VTG is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HTAB vs. VTG — Risk / Return Rank
HTAB
VTG
HTAB vs. VTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HTAB | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HTAB | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.91 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
HTAB vs. VTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HTAB drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, which is greater than VTG's maximum drawdown of -2.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTAB and VTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HTAB | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.76% | -2.89% | -11.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -1.78% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.89% | -0.74% | -2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | — | — |
Volatility
HTAB vs. VTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HTAB | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02% | 3.51% | +0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.74% | 3.51% | +2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.17% | 3.51% | +1.66% |
HTAB vs. VTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HTAB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VTG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
HTAB vs. VTG - Dividend Comparison
HTAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than VTG's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF | 3.83% | 3.88% | 3.57% | 3.21% | 2.26% | 2.18% | 1.64% | 2.77% | 1.61% |
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | 3.20% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HTAB and VTG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for HTAB.
HTAB has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 3.20% for VTG.
They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for HTAB and 0.03% for VTG.
Find the right allocation for HTAB and VTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer