PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HTAB vs. BKAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HTAB vs. BKAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) and BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HTAB vs. BKAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HTAB
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF
0.14%2.86%1.52%7.16%-8.33%-0.12%5.31%
BKAG
BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF
0.22%7.23%1.17%5.67%-13.29%-1.46%2.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HTAB achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than BKAG's 0.22% return.


HTAB

1D
0.43%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
0.14%
6M
1.22%
1Y
3.09%
3Y*
2.63%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*

BKAG

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
0.22%
6M
1.13%
1Y
4.43%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
0.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HTAB vs. BKAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HTAB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BKAG's 0.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HTAB vs. BKAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HTAB
HTAB Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
HTAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTAB Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
HTAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTAB Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BKAG
BKAG Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BKAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKAG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BKAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKAG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HTAB vs. BKAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) and BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HTABBKAGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.55

1.02

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.76

1.42

-0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.18

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

1.87

-1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.14

5.25

-3.12

HTAB vs. BKAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HTAB Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the BKAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HTAB and BKAG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HTABBKAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

1.02

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.04

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.01

+0.41

Correlation

The correlation between HTAB and BKAG is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HTAB vs. BKAG - Dividend Comparison

HTAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than BKAG's 4.18% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HTAB
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF
3.94%3.88%3.57%3.21%2.26%2.18%1.64%2.77%1.61%
BKAG
BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF
4.18%4.17%4.26%3.33%2.49%1.55%1.16%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HTAB vs. BKAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HTAB drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, smaller than the maximum BKAG drawdown of -18.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HTAB and BKAG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HTABBKAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.76%

-18.53%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-2.51%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.76%

-18.00%

+3.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-2.39%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.93%

-7.26%

+4.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

0.89%

+0.91%

Volatility

HTAB vs. BKAG - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) and BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) have volatilities of 1.74% and 1.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HTABBKAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.74%

1.72%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.54%

2.71%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.70%

4.37%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.70%

5.99%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.19%

5.59%

-0.40%