HSXJ.L vs. HMEF.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HSXJ.L (HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) and HMEF.L (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - HSXJ.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while HMEF.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSXJ.L returned 11.56%/yr vs 5.72%/yr for HMEF.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HSXJ.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HMEF.L.

Performance

HSXJ.L vs. HMEF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HSXJ.L is traded in GBP, while HMEF.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HMEF.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSXJ.L achieves a 34.70% return, which is significantly higher than HMEF.L's 25.52% return.

HSXJ.L

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: 11.50%
• YTD: 34.70%
• 6M: 37.46%
• 1Y: 65.64%
• 3Y*: 24.72%
• 5Y*: 11.56%
• 10Y*: —

HMEF.L

• 1D: -1.66%
• 1M: 6.53%
• YTD: 25.52%
• 6M: 27.29%
• 1Y: 51.20%
• 3Y*: 17.76%
• 5Y*: 5.72%
• 10Y*: 8.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSXJ.L vs. HMEF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HSXJ.L HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD	34.70%	23.23%	16.70%	-1.41%	-5.93%	0.54%	16.27%
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD	25.52%	21.88%	6.43%	-0.16%	-12.59%	-4.10%	13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between HSXJ.L and HMEF.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2020	0.94

The correlation between HSXJ.L and HMEF.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

HSXJ.L vs. HMEF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HSXJ.L	HMEF.L
Technology	48.9%	42.9%
Financial Services	21.8%	17.8%
Basic Materials	10.6%	5.9%
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	8.7%
Industrials	4.3%	6.8%
Energy	2.4%	3.5%
Healthcare	2.2%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.3%	2.7%
Real Estate	1.0%	1.0%
Utilities	0.8%	1.9%
Communication Services	0.4%	6.2%

Return for Risk

HSXJ.L vs. HMEF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSXJ.L

HSXJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
HSXJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
HSXJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
HSXJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 94
HSXJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
HSXJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 91

HMEF.L

HMEF.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
HMEF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
HMEF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
HMEF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
HMEF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
HMEF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSXJ.L vs. HMEF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HSXJ.L	HMEF.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.83	2.99	+0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.85	3.88	+0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.69	1.55	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.98	4.60	+1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.00	15.90	+5.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HSXJ.L vs. HMEF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSXJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.83, which is comparable to the HMEF.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSXJ.L and HMEF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HSXJ.L	HMEF.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.83	2.99	+0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.35	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.27	+0.57

Drawdowns

HSXJ.L vs. HMEF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSXJ.L drawdown since its inception was -25.60%, smaller than the maximum HMEF.L drawdown of -32.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSXJ.L and HMEF.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HSXJ.L	HMEF.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.60%	-32.91%	+7.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.93%	-11.07%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.39%	-15.40%	-2.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.07%	-26.99%	+5.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.88%	-2.56%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.52%	-12.28%	+2.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	3.21%	-0.09%

Volatility

HSXJ.L vs. HMEF.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSXJ.L) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) at 7.42%. This indicates that HSXJ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMEF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HSXJ.L	HMEF.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.04%	7.42%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.25%	14.61%	-0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.08%	17.04%	+0.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.37%	16.23%	+0.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.31%	17.92%	-1.61%

HSXJ.L vs. HMEF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSXJ.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HMEF.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HSXJ.L vs. HMEF.L - Dividend Comparison

HSXJ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMEF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%
HSXJ.L HSBC Asia Pacific ex Japan Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HSXJ.L and HMEF.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, HSXJ.L and HMEF.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, HSXJ.L or HMEF.L?

On fees, HMEF.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HSXJ.L or HMEF.L?

HMEF.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HSXJ.L.

What is the main difference between HSXJ.L and HMEF.L?

HSXJ.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while HMEF.L is Emerging Markets Equities. HSXJ.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while HMEF.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HSXJ.L and 0.15% for HMEF.L.