PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HSUK.L vs. HUKX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HSUK.L vs. HUKX.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HSUK.L (HSBC UK Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF GBP) and HUKX.L (HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP) are both Europe Equities funds from HSBC tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSUK.L returned 6.94%/yr vs 11.88%/yr for HUKX.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HSUK.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for HUKX.L.

Performance

HSUK.L vs. HUKX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC UK Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF GBP (HSUK.L) and HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSUK.L is traded in GBP, while HUKX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HUKX.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSUK.L achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than HUKX.L's 5.71% return.

HSUK.L

1D
0.86%
1M
2.53%
YTD
0.34%
6M
1.85%
1Y
11.06%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
—

HUKX.L

1D
0.29%
1M
1.39%
YTD
5.71%
6M
8.18%
1Y
20.97%
3Y*
14.79%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
9.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSUK.L vs. HUKX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSUK.L
HSBC UK Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF GBP		0.34%25.60%10.73%2.55%-6.10%17.82%6.12%
HUKX.L
HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP		5.71%26.20%9.58%7.36%5.07%17.54%8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between HSUK.L and HUKX.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2020

0.87

The correlation between HSUK.L and HUKX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

HSUK.L vs. HUKX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HSUK.L
HUKX.L

Financial Services

30.9%
26.2%

Consumer Defensive

17.1%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
4.5%

Communication Services

11.0%
2.3%

Healthcare

10.4%
12.9%

Industrials

6.6%
13.0%

Basic Materials

5.9%
8.5%

Utilities

3.4%
4.8%

Real Estate

2.5%
1.0%

Technology

1.0%
0.3%

Energy

0.0%
10.7%

Financial Services

HSUK.L
30.9%
HUKX.L
26.2%

Consumer Defensive

HSUK.L
17.1%
HUKX.L
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

HSUK.L
11.2%
HUKX.L
4.5%

Communication Services

HSUK.L
11.0%
HUKX.L
2.3%

Healthcare

HSUK.L
10.4%
HUKX.L
12.9%

Industrials

HSUK.L
6.6%
HUKX.L
13.0%

Basic Materials

HSUK.L
5.9%
HUKX.L
8.5%

Utilities

HSUK.L
3.4%
HUKX.L
4.8%

Real Estate

HSUK.L
2.5%
HUKX.L
1.0%

Technology

HSUK.L
1.0%
HUKX.L
0.3%

Energy

HSUK.L
0.0%
HUKX.L
10.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

HSBC UK Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF GBP

HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP

Often compared with HSUK.L:
HSUK.L vs. VUKG.LHSUK.L vs. CUKX.LHSUK.L vs. HMUD.LHSUK.L vs. HSTC.LHSUK.L vs. HNSS.LHSUK.L vs. LCPE.LHSUK.L vs. MVED.L
Often compared with HUKX.L:
HUKX.L vs. ISF.LHUKX.L vs. VUKG.LHUKX.L vs. VFWAXHUKX.L vs. EUDVHUKX.L vs. LDUK.LHUKX.L vs. HSPD.LHUKX.L vs. LDEG.L

Return for Risk

HSUK.L vs. HUKX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HSUK.L
HSUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
HSUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
HSUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
HUKX.L
HUKX.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HUKX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSUK.L vs. HUKX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC UK Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF GBP (HSUK.L) and HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HSUK.LHUKX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.82
1.93

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.24
2.70

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.36

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

2.38

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.87

8.21

-5.33

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HSUK.L vs. HUKX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSUK.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the HUKX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSUK.L and HUKX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HSUK.LHUKX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

1.93

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.94

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.61

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.53

+0.14

Drawdowns

HSUK.L vs. HUKX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSUK.L drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum HUKX.L drawdown of -34.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSUK.L and HUKX.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HSUK.LHUKX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.87%

-34.22%

+19.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.24%

-8.78%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

-12.95%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.87%

-12.95%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-34.22%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.17%

-3.87%

-1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-4.37%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

2.55%

+1.29%

Volatility

HSUK.L vs. HUKX.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC UK Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF GBP (HSUK.L) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) at 3.90%. This indicates that HSUK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUKX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HSUK.LHUKX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

3.90%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

9.43%

+1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.50%

10.82%

+2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.01%

12.65%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

14.96%

-0.75%

HSUK.L vs. HUKX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSUK.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than HUKX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HSUK.L vs. HUKX.L - Dividend Comparison

HSUK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HUKX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSUK.L
HSBC UK Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF GBP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HUKX.L
HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP		2.85%2.95%3.74%3.50%3.63%3.19%4.04%4.31%4.35%3.79%3.49%3.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

HSUK.L and HUKX.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HUKX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HUKX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for HSUK.L.

Both ETFs track FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for HSUK.L and 0.07% for HUKX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSUK.L and HUKX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer