PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSUK.L vs. HMUD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSUK.L vs. HMUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC UK Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF GBP (HSUK.L) and HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSUK.L is traded in GBP, while HMUD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HMUD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSUK.L achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly lower than HMUD.L's 8.49% return.


HSUK.L

1D
-0.77%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
-0.51%
6M
1.11%
1Y
10.28%
3Y*
11.68%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*

HMUD.L

1D
0.30%
1M
4.70%
YTD
8.49%
6M
8.47%
1Y
22.89%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
13.29%
10Y*
15.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSUK.L vs. HMUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSUK.L
HSBC UK Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF GBP
-0.51%25.60%10.73%2.55%-6.10%17.82%6.12%
HMUD.L
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
8.49%5.78%27.24%21.09%-10.74%28.57%3.94%

Correlation

The correlation between HSUK.L and HMUD.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2020

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSUK.L vs. HMUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSUK.L
HSUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
HSUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
HSUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

HMUD.L
HMUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
HMUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSUK.L vs. HMUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC UK Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF GBP (HSUK.L) and HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSUK.LHMUD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.37

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

3.35

-2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.68

11.84

-9.16

HSUK.L vs. HMUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSUK.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the HMUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSUK.L and HMUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSUK.LHMUD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

2.01

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.86

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.95

-0.29

Drawdowns

HSUK.L vs. HMUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSUK.L drawdown since its inception was -14.87%, smaller than the maximum HMUD.L drawdown of -26.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSUK.L and HMUD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSUK.LHMUD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.87%

-26.43%

+11.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.24%

-6.80%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

-21.51%

+9.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.87%

-21.51%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.98%

-0.01%

-5.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-3.54%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

1.93%

+1.90%

Volatility

HSUK.L vs. HMUD.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC UK Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF GBP (HSUK.L) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) at 3.35%. This indicates that HSUK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSUK.LHMUD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

3.35%

+2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.32%

8.29%

+3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

11.38%

+2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.01%

15.54%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

16.58%

-2.37%

HSUK.L vs. HMUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSUK.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than HMUD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSUK.L vs. HMUD.L - Dividend Comparison

HSUK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HMUD.L
HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF
0.92%0.95%0.82%0.97%1.07%0.78%1.11%1.22%1.45%1.24%1.43%1.43%
HSUK.L
HSBC UK Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF GBP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSUK.L and HMUD.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSUK.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSUK.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HMUD.L.

HSUK.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while HMUD.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. HSUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while HMUD.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for HSUK.L and 0.30% for HMUD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSUK.L and HMUD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer