PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSTE.L vs. XRP-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HSTE.L vs. XRP-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTE.L) and XRP (XRP-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSTE.L achieves a -15.63% return, which is significantly higher than XRP-USD's -37.47% return.


HSTE.L

1D
1.56%
1M
-7.38%
YTD
-15.63%
6M
-15.96%
1Y
-10.18%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
-9.96%
10Y*

XRP-USD

1D
1.46%
1M
-22.57%
YTD
-37.47%
6M
-43.16%
1Y
-46.47%
3Y*
33.79%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSTE.L vs. XRP-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSTE.L
HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF
-15.63%24.64%19.65%-8.46%-27.99%-32.88%-86.54%
XRP-USD
XRP
-37.47%-11.56%237.88%81.04%-59.10%278.06%-60.66%

Correlation

The correlation between HSTE.L and XRP-USD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSTE.L vs. XRP-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSTE.L
HSTE.L Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
HSTE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSTE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSTE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
HSTE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSTE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

XRP-USD
XRP-USD Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
XRP-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRP-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRP-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XRP-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRP-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSTE.L vs. XRP-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTE.L) and XRP (XRP-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSTE.LXRP-USDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.91

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

-0.67

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.71

-1.06

+0.35

HSTE.L vs. XRP-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSTE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is higher than the XRP-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSTE.L and XRP-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSTE.L vs. XRP-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSTE.L drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, roughly equal to the maximum XRP-USD drawdown of -95.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSTE.L and XRP-USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSTE.LXRP-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.65%

-95.87%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.01%

-69.23%

+38.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.96%

-69.23%

+34.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.13%

-77.83%

+10.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.51%

-67.62%

-24.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.79%

-70.99%

-20.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.20%

43.98%

-26.78%

Volatility

HSTE.L vs. XRP-USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTE.L) is 9.98%, while XRP (XRP-USD) has a volatility of 14.05%. This indicates that HSTE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XRP-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSTE.LXRP-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.98%

14.05%

-4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.46%

46.30%

-25.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.54%

56.19%

-28.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.39%

72.34%

-32.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.79%

111.77%

-57.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSTE.L and XRP-USD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSTE.L and XRP-USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer