PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSTE.L vs. ^NDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HSTE.L vs. ^NDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTE.L) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HSTE.L vs. ^NDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSTE.L
HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF
-14.40%24.57%19.70%-8.44%-27.99%-32.88%4.51%
^NDX
NASDAQ 100 Index
-4.87%20.17%24.88%53.81%-32.97%26.63%3.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSTE.L achieves a -14.40% return, which is significantly lower than ^NDX's -4.87% return.


HSTE.L

1D
1.43%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
-14.40%
6M
-26.60%
1Y
-12.26%
3Y*
3.87%
5Y*
-11.04%
10Y*

^NDX

1D
1.18%
1M
-3.89%
YTD
-4.87%
6M
-3.15%
1Y
23.58%
3Y*
22.14%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
18.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSTE.L vs. ^NDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSTE.L
HSTE.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
HSTE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSTE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSTE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
HSTE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSTE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

^NDX
^NDX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
^NDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
^NDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSTE.L vs. ^NDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTE.L) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSTE.L^NDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.42

1.04

-1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.41

1.62

-2.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.23

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

1.93

-2.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.89

7.05

-7.94

HSTE.L vs. ^NDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSTE.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the ^NDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSTE.L and ^NDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSTE.L^NDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

1.04

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

0.56

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.55

-0.79

Correlation

The correlation between HSTE.L and ^NDX is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

HSTE.L vs. ^NDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSTE.L drawdown since its inception was -74.82%, smaller than the maximum ^NDX drawdown of -82.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSTE.L and ^NDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HSTE.L^NDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.82%

-82.90%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.99%

-12.72%

-17.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.29%

-35.56%

-32.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.99%

-8.04%

-47.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.73%

-24.72%

-28.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.93%

3.49%

+9.44%

Volatility

HSTE.L vs. ^NDX - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Hang Seng Tech UCITS ETF (HSTE.L) has a higher volatility of 8.82% compared to NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX) at 6.65%. This indicates that HSTE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^NDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HSTE.L^NDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.82%

6.65%

+2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.73%

12.93%

+5.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.94%

22.77%

+6.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.12%

22.61%

+16.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.19%

22.48%

+16.71%