PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSRT vs. ROSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSRT vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HSRT

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ROSC

1D
-0.88%
1M
0.50%
YTD
11.71%
6M
12.39%
1Y
30.49%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*
10.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSRT vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HSRT
Hartford AAA CLO ETF
0.00%0.60%6.44%7.52%-4.40%0.58%3.77%6.95%0.40%
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
11.71%10.18%7.28%18.88%-10.58%31.37%5.27%17.09%-14.33%

Correlation

The correlation between HSRT and ROSC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2018

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSRT vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSRT

ROSC
ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSRT vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HSRT vs. ROSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSRTROSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

Drawdowns

HSRT vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSRTROSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

Volatility

HSRT vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSRTROSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.28%

HSRT vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSRT has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSRT vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison

HSRT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSRT
Hartford AAA CLO ETF
0.00%1.29%6.37%3.98%2.67%2.23%2.88%3.50%1.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.87%2.08%2.00%2.01%1.51%2.13%1.75%3.05%2.86%2.13%2.20%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSRT and ROSC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSRT is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSRT is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ROSC.

ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.00% for HSRT.

HSRT is categorized as CLO, while ROSC is Small Cap Blend Equities. HSRT tracks JP Morgan CLOIE AAA Index, while ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for HSRT and 0.34% for ROSC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSRT and ROSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer