HSRT vs. RAAA

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

HSRT (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) and RAAA (Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. HSRT is passively managed, while RAAA is actively managed. HSRT charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RAAA.

Performance

HSRT vs. RAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT) and Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HSRT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RAAA

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 2.24%
• 6M: 2.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSRT vs. RAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF	2.24%	2.46%

Return for Risk

HSRT vs. RAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT) and Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HSRT	RAAA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	3.79	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	HSRT	RAAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.17%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HSRT	RAAA	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.39%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	1.39%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	1.39%	—

HSRT vs. RAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSRT has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than RAAA's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

HSRT vs. RAAA - Dividend Comparison

HSRT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF	0.00%	1.29%	6.37%	3.98%	2.67%	2.23%	2.88%	3.50%	1.62%
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF	4.79%	2.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, HSRT or RAAA?

On fees, HSRT is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HSRT or RAAA?

HSRT is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RAAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HSRT or RAAA?

RAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 0.00% for HSRT.

What is the main difference between HSRT and RAAA?

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Reckoner. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for HSRT and 0.30% for RAAA.