HSRT vs. HFSI
HSRT (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) and HFSI (Hartford Strategic Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HSRT is a CLO fund tracking the JP Morgan CLOIE AAA Index, while HFSI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Hartford. HSRT is passively managed, while HFSI is actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HSRT charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HFSI.
Performance
HSRT vs. HFSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HSRT
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HFSI
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 8.47%
- 3Y*
- 8.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSRT vs. HFSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 0.00% | 0.60% | 6.44% | 7.52% | -4.40% | -0.33% |
HFSI Hartford Strategic Income ETF | 1.38% | 9.56% | 7.91% | 9.91% | -12.60% | -1.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSRT and HFSI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021 | 0.40 |
The correlation between HSRT and HFSI shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (3 years) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSRT vs. HFSI — Risk / Return Rank
HSRT
HFSI
HSRT vs. HFSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford AAA CLO ETF (HSRT) and Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSRT | HFSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.55 | — |
Drawdowns
HSRT vs. HFSI - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSRT | HFSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -19.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.20% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -5.72% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.76% | — |
Volatility
HSRT vs. HFSI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSRT | HFSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.58% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 4.97% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 4.97% | — |
HSRT vs. HFSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSRT has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than HFSI's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
HSRT vs. HFSI - Dividend Comparison
HSRT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HFSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFSI Hartford Strategic Income ETF | 5.54% | 5.67% | 6.51% | 5.77% | 4.87% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HSRT Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 0.00% | 1.29% | 6.37% | 3.98% | 2.67% | 2.23% | 2.88% | 3.50% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSRT and HFSI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSRT is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSRT is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HFSI.
HFSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.00% for HSRT.
HSRT is categorized as CLO, while HFSI is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for HSRT and 0.49% for HFSI.
Find the right allocation for HSRT and HFSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer