PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSPX.L vs. XDWE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSPX.L vs. XDWE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSPX.L achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than XDWE.L's 11.09% return. Over the past 10 years, HSPX.L has outperformed XDWE.L with an annualized return of 14.71%, while XDWE.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.21% annualized return.


HSPX.L

1D
-0.45%
1M
-0.31%
6M
9.63%
YTD
10.04%
1Y
20.87%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
13.52%
10Y*
14.71%

XDWE.L

1D
-0.72%
1M
-0.05%
6M
8.14%
YTD
11.09%
1Y
17.39%
3Y*
12.49%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
11.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSPX.L vs. XDWE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSPX.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.04%9.36%27.32%19.94%-9.10%30.95%13.89%26.37%0.09%10.81%
XDWE.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
11.09%3.94%14.06%7.78%-1.34%31.37%7.89%23.88%-3.60%7.83%

Correlation

The correlation between HSPX.L and XDWE.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2014

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between HSPX.L and XDWE.L has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HSPX.L vs. XDWE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSPX.L
XDWE.L

Technology

37.9%
20.9%

Financial Services

11.7%
13.9%

Communication Services

10.0%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
10.0%

Healthcare

9.1%
11.1%

Industrials

8.4%
14.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
6.4%

Energy

3.0%
4.0%

Utilities

2.3%
5.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
6.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
3.9%

Technology

HSPX.L
37.9%
XDWE.L
20.9%

Financial Services

HSPX.L
11.7%
XDWE.L
13.9%

Communication Services

HSPX.L
10.0%
XDWE.L
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

HSPX.L
9.6%
XDWE.L
10.0%

Healthcare

HSPX.L
9.1%
XDWE.L
11.1%

Industrials

HSPX.L
8.4%
XDWE.L
14.2%

Consumer Defensive

HSPX.L
4.6%
XDWE.L
6.4%

Energy

HSPX.L
3.0%
XDWE.L
4.0%

Utilities

HSPX.L
2.3%
XDWE.L
5.7%

Real Estate

HSPX.L
1.9%
XDWE.L
6.1%

Basic Materials

HSPX.L
1.7%
XDWE.L
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSPX.L vs. XDWE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSPX.L
HSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
HSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWE.L
XDWE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XDWE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSPX.L vs. XDWE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSPX.LXDWE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.07

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.35

9.79

+0.56

HSPX.L vs. XDWE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the XDWE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSPX.L and XDWE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSPX.L vs. XDWE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -44.77%, smaller than the maximum XDWE.L drawdown of -98.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPX.L and XDWE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSPX.LXDWE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.77%

-98.55%

+53.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-5.64%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.76%

-19.89%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.76%

-19.89%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.43%

-31.08%

+5.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-1.97%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-4.82%

-4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.77%

+0.24%

Volatility

HSPX.L vs. XDWE.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) has a higher volatility of 2.91% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDWE.L) at 2.73%. This indicates that HSPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSPX.LXDWE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

2.73%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.88%

6.79%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.14%

9.66%

+1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.30%

19.53%

-5.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.35%

18.60%

-3.25%

HSPX.L vs. XDWE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSPX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWE.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HSPX.L vs. XDWE.L - Dividend Comparison

HSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while XDWE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSPX.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.83%0.94%0.98%1.19%1.27%0.95%1.41%1.47%1.60%1.54%1.49%1.61%
XDWE.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSPX.L and XDWE.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSPX.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XDWE.L.

HSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while XDWE.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for HSPX.L and 0.20% for XDWE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSPX.L and XDWE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer