HSPX.L vs. I500.L
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (I500.L).
HSPX.L and I500.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HSPX.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on May 14, 2010. I500.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Sep 24, 2020. Both HSPX.L and I500.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HSPX.L or I500.L.
Key characteristics
| HSPX.L | I500.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 24.67% | 24.84% |
| 1Y Return | 31.52% | 31.72% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.69% | 11.91% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.76 | 0.94 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.92 | 1.56 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.54 | 1.46 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.78 | 1.54 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.34 | 3.12 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.60% | 9.99% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.18% | 33.05% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.43% | -20.20% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSPX.L and I500.L is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
HSPX.L vs. I500.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HSPX.L having a 24.67% return and I500.L slightly higher at 24.84%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HSPX.L vs. I500.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSPX.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than I500.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HSPX.L vs. I500.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (I500.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HSPX.L vs. I500.L - Dividend Comparison
HSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while I500.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPX.L HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 1.00% | 1.19% | 1.27% | 0.95% | 1.41% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.54% | 1.49% | 1.61% | 1.36% | 1.62% |
I500.L iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HSPX.L vs. I500.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, which is greater than I500.L's maximum drawdown of -20.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPX.L and I500.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HSPX.L vs. I500.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (I500.L) have volatilities of 3.37% and 3.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.