PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSPS.L vs. IUSA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSPS.L vs. IUSA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HSPS.L) and iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSPS.L is traded in GBP, while IUSA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IUSA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HSPS.L having a 10.51% return and IUSA.L slightly higher at 10.67%.


HSPS.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
5.46%
YTD
10.51%
6M
10.41%
1Y
29.09%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
10Y*

IUSA.L

1D
0.04%
1M
5.55%
YTD
10.67%
6M
10.66%
1Y
29.55%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
15.33%
10Y*
16.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSPS.L vs. IUSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HSPS.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.51%9.33%27.36%19.90%4.27%
IUSA.L
iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist
10.67%9.70%27.73%20.24%4.16%

Correlation

The correlation between HSPS.L and IUSA.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2022

0.99

The correlation between HSPS.L and IUSA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSPS.L vs. IUSA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSPS.L
HSPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HSPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
HSPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSA.L
IUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSPS.L vs. IUSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HSPS.L) and iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSPS.LIUSA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.53

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

4.20

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.12

15.53

-1.41

HSPS.L vs. IUSA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the IUSA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSPS.L and IUSA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSPS.LIUSA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

2.82

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

0.58

+0.73

Drawdowns

HSPS.L vs. IUSA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSPS.L drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, smaller than the maximum IUSA.L drawdown of -38.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPS.L and IUSA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSPS.LIUSA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.94%

-38.58%

+17.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

-7.01%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.94%

-21.08%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.22%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-7.29%

+3.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.90%

+0.15%

Volatility

HSPS.L vs. IUSA.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HSPS.L) and iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist (IUSA.L) have volatilities of 2.63% and 2.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSPS.LIUSA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

2.62%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

7.13%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.50%

10.44%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.73%

14.33%

-0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.73%

15.60%

-1.87%

HSPS.L vs. IUSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSPS.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HSPS.L vs. IUSA.L - Dividend Comparison

HSPS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSPS.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUSA.L
iShares S&P 500 UCITS Dist
1.15%1.24%1.28%1.55%1.74%1.39%1.80%1.96%2.22%1.95%1.75%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, HSPS.L and IUSA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for HSPS.L.

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for HSPS.L and 0.07% for IUSA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSPS.L and IUSA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer