HSPS.L vs. CSPX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HSPS.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L).
HSPS.L and CSPX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HSPS.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Jun 21, 2022. CSPX.L is a passively managed fund by Blackrock Financial Management that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 18, 2010. Both HSPS.L and CSPX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HSPS.L or CSPX.L.
Key characteristics
| HSPS.L | CSPX.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.50% | 18.56% |
| 1Y Return | 20.83% | 28.66% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.76 | 2.29 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.46% | 12.21% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.91% | -33.90% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.08% | -0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSPS.L and CSPX.L is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
HSPS.L vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, HSPS.L achieves a 14.50% return, which is significantly lower than CSPX.L's 18.56% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HSPS.L vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSPS.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HSPS.L vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HSPS.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HSPS.L vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither HSPS.L nor CSPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
HSPS.L vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSPS.L drawdown since its inception was -11.91%, smaller than the maximum CSPX.L drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPS.L and CSPX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HSPS.L vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HSPS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 3.96%. This indicates that HSPS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.