PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSPS.L vs. SPYL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSPS.L vs. SPYL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HSPS.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HSPS.L is traded in GBP, while SPYL.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SPYL.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with HSPS.L at 10.55% and SPYL.DE at 10.55%.


HSPS.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
5.98%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.55%
1Y
29.12%
3Y*
19.33%
5Y*
10Y*

SPYL.DE

1D
-0.31%
1M
6.25%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.45%
1Y
29.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSPS.L vs. SPYL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HSPS.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.55%9.33%27.36%8.45%
SPYL.DE
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc)
10.55%10.16%26.56%9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between HSPS.L and SPYL.DE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023

0.94

The correlation between HSPS.L and SPYL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSPS.L vs. SPYL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSPS.L
HSPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HSPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HSPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYL.DE
SPYL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSPS.L vs. SPYL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HSPS.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSPS.LSPYL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.48

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

4.11

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.14

14.79

-0.65

HSPS.L vs. SPYL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSPS.L and SPYL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSPS.LSPYL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

2.63

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

1.61

-0.30

Drawdowns

HSPS.L vs. SPYL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSPS.L drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYL.DE drawdown of -22.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPS.L and SPYL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSPS.LSPYL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.94%

-22.01%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

-7.08%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.31%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-2.87%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.97%

+0.08%

Volatility

HSPS.L vs. SPYL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HSPS.L) is 2.62%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) has a volatility of 3.13%. This indicates that HSPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSPS.LSPYL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

3.13%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

7.45%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.57%

11.13%

-0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.73%

13.84%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.73%

13.84%

-0.11%

HSPS.L vs. SPYL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSPS.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYL.DE's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HSPS.L vs. SPYL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither HSPS.L nor SPYL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, HSPS.L and SPYL.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPYL.DE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYL.DE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for HSPS.L.

Both ETFs track S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for HSPS.L and 0.03% for SPYL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSPS.L and SPYL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer