PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSPD.L vs. BYBU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSPD.L vs. BYBU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPD.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSPD.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than BYBU.L's 8.18% return.


HSPD.L

1D
0.02%
1M
4.45%
YTD
10.31%
6M
11.11%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
22.18%
5Y*
13.69%
10Y*
15.23%

BYBU.L

1D
0.96%
1M
4.76%
YTD
8.18%
6M
9.93%
1Y
22.65%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSPD.L vs. BYBU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSPD.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.31%17.39%25.26%26.91%-18.83%29.36%17.88%30.46%-5.36%9.55%
BYBU.L
Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD
8.18%17.38%14.97%15.90%-12.83%37.69%3.27%31.62%-6.60%8.16%

Correlation

The correlation between HSPD.L and BYBU.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2017

0.41

Over the past year, HSPD.L and BYBU.L have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.

HSPD.L vs. BYBU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSPD.L
BYBU.L

Technology

35.6%
22.4%

Financial Services

11.8%
27.9%

Communication Services

11.2%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
15.8%

Healthcare

8.5%
7.5%

Industrials

8.3%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
3.7%

Energy

3.5%
5.2%

Utilities

2.3%
0.9%

Real Estate

1.9%
3.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.1%

Technology

HSPD.L
35.6%
BYBU.L
22.4%

Financial Services

HSPD.L
11.8%
BYBU.L
27.9%

Communication Services

HSPD.L
11.2%
BYBU.L
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

HSPD.L
10.1%
BYBU.L
15.8%

Healthcare

HSPD.L
8.5%
BYBU.L
7.5%

Industrials

HSPD.L
8.3%
BYBU.L
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

HSPD.L
4.9%
BYBU.L
3.7%

Energy

HSPD.L
3.5%
BYBU.L
5.2%

Utilities

HSPD.L
2.3%
BYBU.L
0.9%

Real Estate

HSPD.L
1.9%
BYBU.L
3.0%

Basic Materials

HSPD.L
1.8%
BYBU.L
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSPD.L vs. BYBU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSPD.L
HSPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HSPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HSPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

BYBU.L
BYBU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BYBU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYBU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYBU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BYBU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYBU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSPD.L vs. BYBU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPD.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSPD.LBYBU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.33

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

4.34

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.45

12.04

+2.41

HSPD.L vs. BYBU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSPD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the BYBU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSPD.L and BYBU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSPD.LBYBU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

1.90

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.83

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

1.14

-0.18

Drawdowns

HSPD.L vs. BYBU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSPD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.00%, which is greater than BYBU.L's maximum drawdown of -28.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSPD.L and BYBU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSPD.LBYBU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.00%

-28.64%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.24%

-5.19%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-19.21%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.59%

-22.11%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

0.00%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.76%

-4.86%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.88%

+0.04%

Volatility

HSPD.L vs. BYBU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF (HSPD.L) is 3.23%, while Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD (BYBU.L) has a volatility of 3.55%. This indicates that HSPD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYBU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSPD.LBYBU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

3.55%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.47%

8.14%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

11.86%

-0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.91%

21.25%

-5.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

27.74%

-11.51%

HSPD.L vs. BYBU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSPD.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BYBU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HSPD.L vs. BYBU.L - Dividend Comparison

HSPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while BYBU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BYBU.L
Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF-C USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HSPD.L
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.83%0.90%1.00%1.18%1.34%0.98%1.32%1.41%1.68%1.44%1.65%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSPD.L and BYBU.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HSPD.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HSPD.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BYBU.L.

HSPD.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while BYBU.L tracks S&P 500 Buyback NTR. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for HSPD.L and 0.15% for BYBU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSPD.L and BYBU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer