PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSMV vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSMV vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSMV achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 48.69% return.


HSMV

1D
0.11%
1M
1.43%
6M
7.25%
YTD
10.55%
1Y
13.34%
3Y*
9.06%
5Y*
4.96%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.73%

TNA

1D
-1.37%
1M
-7.22%
6M
28.70%
YTD
48.69%
1Y
108.54%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
-4.05%
10Y*
7.13%
ALL TIME*
14.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$628.29K$333.01K$191.20K
$284.85M$300.19M$411.47M

HSMV vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
10.55%1.57%13.17%5.01%-9.44%23.72%34.70%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
48.69%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%335.99%

Correlation

The correlation between HSMV and TNA is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2020

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between HSMV and TNA has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HSMV vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSMV
TNA

Real Estate

23.7%
6.6%

Financial Services

17.5%
17.5%

Industrials

14.9%
14.2%

Utilities

11.5%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
2.6%

Basic Materials

5.8%
4.4%

Healthcare

4.7%
20.3%

Energy

2.8%
5.5%

Communication Services

2.2%
2.2%

Technology

1.9%
14.8%

Real Estate

HSMV
23.7%
TNA
6.6%

Financial Services

HSMV
17.5%
TNA
17.5%

Industrials

HSMV
14.9%
TNA
14.2%

Utilities

HSMV
11.5%
TNA
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

HSMV
8.3%
TNA
9.2%

Consumer Defensive

HSMV
6.7%
TNA
2.6%

Basic Materials

HSMV
5.8%
TNA
4.4%

Healthcare

HSMV
4.7%
TNA
20.3%

Energy

HSMV
2.8%
TNA
5.5%

Communication Services

HSMV
2.2%
TNA
2.2%

Technology

HSMV
1.9%
TNA
14.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSMV vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HSMV
HSMV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
HSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
HSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HSMV vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSMVTNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

2.95

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.02

9.70

-4.68

HSMV vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSMV and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSMV vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSMV drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSMV and TNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSMVTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.16%

-88.09%

+68.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-32.53%

+24.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.45%

-65.78%

+50.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.16%

-82.36%

+63.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-37.12%

+35.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-33.92%

+28.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

9.90%

-7.31%

Volatility

HSMV vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) is 3.77%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 11.41%. This indicates that HSMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSMVTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

11.41%

-7.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.07%

42.11%

-34.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.73%

57.87%

-47.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

67.19%

-52.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.97%

68.35%

-52.38%

HSMV vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSMV vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

HSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than TNA's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
1.86%2.01%1.43%1.43%1.26%0.76%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.31%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSMV and TNA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNA has higher volatility (11.41%) compared to HSMV (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSMV dropped -19.16% vs TNA's -88.09%.

On 5-year performance, HSMV leads with 4.96% vs -4.05% for TNA. On fees, HSMV is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, HSMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HSMV has performed better with a 4.96% return vs -4.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HSMV is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

HSMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.31% for TNA.

HSMV is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while TNA is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HSMV and 1.05% for TNA.

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSMV and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer