PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSMV vs. SCHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HSMV vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSMV achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 19.79% return.


HSMV

1D
-0.50%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
3.11%
6M
3.06%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
8.36%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*

SCHA

1D
-0.58%
1M
4.77%
YTD
19.79%
6M
19.32%
1Y
40.27%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
11.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSMV vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
3.11%1.57%13.17%5.01%-9.44%23.72%34.70%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
19.79%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%75.07%

Correlation

The correlation between HSMV and SCHA is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2020

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between HSMV and SCHA has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HSMV vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HSMV
SCHA

Real Estate

23.8%
6.0%

Financial Services

16.6%
15.7%

Industrials

15.0%
15.4%

Utilities

11.9%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
9.0%

Basic Materials

5.4%
4.2%

Healthcare

4.9%
13.5%

Energy

2.8%
5.5%

Communication Services

2.3%
2.4%

Technology

1.7%
23.3%

Real Estate

HSMV
23.8%
SCHA
6.0%

Financial Services

HSMV
16.6%
SCHA
15.7%

Industrials

HSMV
15.0%
SCHA
15.4%

Utilities

HSMV
11.9%
SCHA
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

HSMV
7.9%
SCHA
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

HSMV
7.8%
SCHA
9.0%

Basic Materials

HSMV
5.4%
SCHA
4.2%

Healthcare

HSMV
4.9%
SCHA
13.5%

Energy

HSMV
2.8%
SCHA
5.5%

Communication Services

HSMV
2.3%
SCHA
2.4%

Technology

HSMV
1.7%
SCHA
23.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSMV vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSMV
HSMV Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
HSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSMV vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HSMVSCHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.38

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

4.26

-3.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

15.66

-14.03

HSMV vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSMV and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HSMVSCHADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

2.25

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.33

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.57

+0.10

Drawdowns

HSMV vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSMV drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSMV and SCHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSMVSCHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.16%

-42.41%

+23.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-9.50%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.45%

-27.29%

+11.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.16%

-30.79%

+11.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.36%

-0.58%

-3.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

-7.58%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.58%

+0.01%

Volatility

HSMV vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) is 2.85%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that HSMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSMVSCHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

5.08%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.28%

12.83%

-5.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

18.01%

-7.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.00%

21.93%

-6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

22.71%

-6.65%

HSMV vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HSMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

HSMV vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

HSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than SCHA's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
2.00%2.01%1.43%1.43%1.26%0.76%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
1.00%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


HSMV and SCHA have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHA has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to HSMV (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSMV dropped -19.16% vs SCHA's -42.41%.

On 5-year performance, SCHA leads with 7.13% vs 3.69% for HSMV. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, HSMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 7.13% return vs 3.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HSMV.

HSMV has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.00% for SCHA.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HSMV and 0.04% for SCHA.

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSMV and SCHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer