HSMV vs. CSB
HSMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF) and CSB (VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. HSMV is actively managed, while CSB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HSMV returned 3.69%/yr vs 3.65%/yr for CSB. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HSMV charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CSB.
Performance
HSMV vs. CSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSMV achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than CSB's 8.30% return.
HSMV
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 4.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- —
CSB
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 8.30%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- 1Y
- 17.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
HSMV vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF | 3.11% | 1.57% | 13.17% | 5.01% | -9.44% | 23.72% | 34.70% |
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 8.30% | 2.26% | 9.64% | 12.60% | -13.11% | 27.04% | 67.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSMV and CSB is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between HSMV and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
HSMV vs. CSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HSMV
CSB
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Technology
Real Estate
HSMV
CSB
-
Financial Services
HSMV
CSB
Industrials
HSMV
CSB
Utilities
HSMV
CSB
Consumer Defensive
HSMV
CSB
Consumer Cyclical
HSMV
CSB
Basic Materials
HSMV
CSB
Healthcare
HSMV
CSB
Energy
HSMV
CSB
Communication Services
HSMV
CSB
Technology
HSMV
CSB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSMV vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank
HSMV
CSB
HSMV vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSMV | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.22 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 2.51 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.62 | 7.26 | -5.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSMV | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 1.25 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.20 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.45 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
HSMV vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSMV drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum CSB drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSMV and CSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSMV | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.16% | -42.07% | +22.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.83% | -7.18% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.45% | -21.82% | +6.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.16% | -24.49% | +5.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.36% | -3.12% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.62% | -7.14% | +1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 2.48% | +0.11% |
Volatility
HSMV vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF (HSMV) is 2.85%, while VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that HSMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSMV | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 3.59% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.28% | 9.19% | -1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 14.54% | -4.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.00% | 18.78% | -3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 21.31% | -5.25% |
HSMV vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
HSMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
HSMV vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison
HSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than CSB's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.26% | 3.54% | 3.12% | 3.45% | 3.60% | 3.11% | 3.70% | 3.19% | 3.45% | 3.19% | 2.85% | 1.57% |
HSMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.43% | 1.43% | 1.26% | 0.76% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HSMV and CSB have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSB has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to HSMV (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSMV dropped -19.16% vs CSB's -42.07%.
On 5-year performance, HSMV leads with 3.69% vs 3.65% for CSB. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HSMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HSMV has performed better with a 3.69% return vs 3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HSMV.
CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.00% for HSMV.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HSMV and 0.35% for CSB.
CSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSMV and CSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer