HSIC vs. CAH

In the year-to-date period, HSIC achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than CAH's 7.22% return. Over the past 10 years, HSIC has underperformed CAH with an annualized return of 3.07%, while CAH has yielded a comparatively higher 7.51% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HSIC Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the CAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSIC and CAH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

HSIC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.

The maximum HSIC drawdown since its inception was -78.48%, which is greater than CAH's maximum drawdown of -61.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSIC and CAH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) has a higher volatility of 7.98% compared to Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) at 4.16%. This indicates that HSIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Henry Schein, Inc. and Cardinal Health, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.