HSIC vs. CAH
HSIC (Henry Schein, Inc.) and CAH (Cardinal Health, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Medical Distribution industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 10 years, HSIC returned 0.94%/yr vs 12.53%/yr for CAH. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HSIC vs. CAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSIC achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly higher than CAH's -4.23% return. Over the past 10 years, HSIC has underperformed CAH with an annualized return of 0.94%, while CAH has yielded a comparatively higher 12.53% annualized return.
HSIC
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- 7.33%
- 3Y*
- 0.59%
- 5Y*
- -0.56%
- 10Y*
- 0.94%
CAH
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -4.23%
- 6M
- -1.45%
- 1Y
- 27.38%
- 3Y*
- 34.49%
- 5Y*
- 31.19%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
HSIC vs. CAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSIC Henry Schein, Inc. | 0.21% | 9.22% | -8.60% | -5.21% | 3.02% | 15.96% | 0.21% | 8.34% | 12.36% | -7.88% |
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | -4.23% | 76.25% | 19.01% | 34.15% | 54.08% | -0.40% | 10.09% | 18.04% | -24.50% | -12.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSIC and CAH is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 1995 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HSIC and CAH has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
HSIC:
$8.79B
CAH:
$46.22B
HSIC:
$3.30
CAH:
$6.55
HSIC:
22.92
CAH:
29.90
HSIC:
0.68
CAH:
0.19
HSIC:
$13.38B
CAH:
$250.55B
HSIC:
$3.91B
CAH:
$9.23B
HSIC:
$940.00M
CAH:
$2.79B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSIC vs. CAH — Risk / Return Rank
HSIC
CAH
HSIC vs. CAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) and Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HSIC | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | 0.92 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | 1.65 | -1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.22 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 1.35 | -0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.89 | 3.60 | -2.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HSIC | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 0.92 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 1.24 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.43 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.56 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
HSIC vs. CAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSIC drawdown since its inception was -78.49%, which is greater than CAH's maximum drawdown of -61.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSIC and CAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSIC | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.49% | -61.93% | -16.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.23% | -20.42% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.59% | -20.42% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.70% | -22.80% | -9.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.42% | -46.13% | +4.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.64% | -14.60% | -3.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.26% | -15.94% | +0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.27% | 7.63% | +0.64% |
Volatility
HSIC vs. CAH - Volatility Comparison
Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) has a higher volatility of 7.87% compared to Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) at 7.39%. This indicates that HSIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSIC | CAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.87% | 7.39% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | 19.63% | -1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.29% | 29.75% | -2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.41% | 25.20% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.53% | 29.21% | -1.68% |
Dividends
HSIC vs. CAH - Dividend Comparison
HSIC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAH Cardinal Health, Inc. | 1.04% | 0.99% | 1.28% | 1.98% | 2.57% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 3.80% | 4.24% | 3.00% | 2.41% | 1.68% |
HSIC Henry Schein, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
HSIC vs. CAH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Henry Schein, Inc. and Cardinal Health, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HSIC vs. CAH - Profitability Comparison
HSIC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Henry Schein, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.00B and revenue of 3.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.8%.
CAH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.50B and revenue of 60.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.1%.
HSIC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Henry Schein, Inc. reported an operating income of 194.00M and revenue of 3.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.
CAH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported an operating income of 509.00M and revenue of 60.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.8%.
HSIC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Henry Schein, Inc. reported a net income of 107.00M and revenue of 3.37B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
CAH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cardinal Health, Inc. reported a net income of 399.00M and revenue of 60.94B, resulting in a net margin of 0.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HSIC and CAH have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HSIC has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to CAH (7.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSIC dropped -78.49% vs CAH's -61.93%.
CAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSIC and CAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer