PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HSIC vs. CADE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

HSIC vs. CADE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) and Cadence Bancorporation (CADE).

Performance

HSIC vs. CADE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) and Cadence Bancorporation (CADE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HSIC vs. CADE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSIC
Henry Schein, Inc.		-2.49%9.22%-8.60%-5.21%3.02%15.96%0.21%8.34%12.36%-16.74%
CADE
Cadence Bancorporation		-0.91%28.38%20.36%24.98%-14.34%16.67%-9.67%23.07%-15.28%10.05%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HSIC:

$8.72B

CADE:

$7.98B

EPS

HSIC:

$3.30

CADE:

$2.88

PE Ratio

HSIC:

22.35

CADE:

14.60

PS Ratio

HSIC:

0.67

CADE:

2.89

PB Ratio

HSIC:

2.69

CADE:

1.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

HSIC:

$13.18B

CADE:

$2.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HSIC:

$3.84B

CADE:

$1.36B

EBITDA (TTM)

HSIC:

$999.00M

CADE:

$564.17M

Returns By Period

HSIC

1D
1.38%
1M
-10.55%
YTD
-2.49%
6M
11.04%
1Y
7.61%
3Y*
-3.31%
5Y*
1.42%
10Y*
0.84%

CADE

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Henry Schein, Inc.

Cadence Bancorporation

Often compared with HSIC:
HSIC vs. PDCOHSIC vs. CAHHSIC vs. HRLHSIC vs. AAPLHSIC vs. HSYHSIC vs. XLUHSIC vs. XLI
Often compared with CADE:
CADE vs. TRMKCADE vs. RNSTCADE vs. QQQCADE vs. RFCADE vs. VOOCADE vs. SPYCADE vs. IVZ

Return for Risk

HSIC vs. CADE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HSIC
HSIC Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
HSIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSIC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HSIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSIC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
CADE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSIC vs. CADE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) and Cadence Bancorporation (CADE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HSICCADEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

—

—

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.60

—

—

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

—

—

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

—

—

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.02

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HSIC vs. CADE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HSICCADEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

—

—

Correlation

The correlation between HSIC and CADE is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HSIC vs. CADE - Dividend Comparison

HSIC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CADE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%.

TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HSIC
Henry Schein, Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CADE
Cadence Bancorporation		2.78%2.57%2.90%3.18%3.57%7.34%2.72%2.26%2.37%1.29%

Drawdowns

HSIC vs. CADE - Drawdown Comparison

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

HSICCADEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.49%

—

—

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.93%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.70%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.42%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.86%

—

—

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.24%

—

—

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.26%

—

—

Volatility

HSIC vs. CADE - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

HSICCADEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.95%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.53%

—

—

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.56%

—

—

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.43%

—

—

Financials

HSIC vs. CADE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Henry Schein, Inc. and Cadence Bancorporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
3.44B
787.17M
(HSIC) Total Revenue
(CADE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HSIC vs. CADE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Henry Schein, Inc. and Cadence Bancorporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual
-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
28.9%
0
Portfolio components
HSIC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Henry Schein, Inc. reported a gross profit of 994.00M and revenue of 3.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.9%.

CADE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cadence Bancorporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 787.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HSIC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Henry Schein, Inc. reported an operating income of 186.00M and revenue of 3.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

CADE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cadence Bancorporation reported an operating income of 198.70M and revenue of 787.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.

HSIC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Henry Schein, Inc. reported a net income of 101.00M and revenue of 3.44B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.

CADE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cadence Bancorporation reported a net income of 146.75M and revenue of 787.17M, resulting in a net margin of 18.6%.