PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CADE vs. RF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CADERF
YTD Return0.09%5.07%
1Y Return68.24%30.99%
3Y Return (Ann)2.46%-0.92%
5Y Return (Ann)4.62%11.14%
10Y Return (Ann)5.76%10.88%
Sharpe Ratio1.841.08
Daily Std Dev38.41%31.92%
Max Drawdown-69.23%-92.65%
Current Drawdown-6.50%-13.01%

Fundamentals


CADERF
Market Cap$5.33B$18.16B
EPS$2.02$1.85
PE Ratio14.4910.72
PEG Ratio0.009.99
Revenue (TTM)$1.19B$6.80B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.84B$6.94B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CADE and RF is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CADE vs. RF - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CADE achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than RF's 5.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CADE has underperformed RF with an annualized return of 5.76%, while RF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.88% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%1,600.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
726.30%
1,502.10%
CADE
RF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cadence Bancorporation

Regions Financial Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CADE vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cadence Bancorporation (CADE) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CADE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CADE, currently valued at 1.84, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.84
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CADE, currently valued at 2.65, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.65
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CADE, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CADE, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.54
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CADE, currently valued at 6.89, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.006.89
RF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RF, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.08
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RF, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.59
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RF, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.21
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RF, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.84
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RF, currently valued at 2.75, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.002.75

CADE vs. RF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CADE Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the RF Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CADE and RF.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.84
1.08
CADE
RF

Dividends

CADE vs. RF - Dividend Comparison

CADE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than RF's 4.58% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CADE
Cadence Bancorporation
3.25%3.18%3.57%7.28%2.72%2.26%2.37%1.69%1.45%1.46%1.11%0.47%
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
4.58%4.54%3.43%2.98%3.85%3.44%3.44%1.82%1.78%2.40%1.70%1.01%

Drawdowns

CADE vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CADE drawdown since its inception was -69.23%, smaller than the maximum RF drawdown of -92.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CADE and RF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-6.50%
-13.01%
CADE
RF

Volatility

CADE vs. RF - Volatility Comparison

Cadence Bancorporation (CADE) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to Regions Financial Corporation (RF) at 4.85%. This indicates that CADE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.96%
4.85%
CADE
RF

Financials

CADE vs. RF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cadence Bancorporation and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items