CADE vs. RF
Compare and contrast key facts about Cadence Bancorporation (CADE) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF).
Performance
CADE vs. RF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CADE vs. RF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CADE Cadence Bancorporation | -0.91% | 28.38% | 20.36% | 24.98% | -14.34% | 16.67% | -9.67% | 23.07% | -15.28% | 10.05% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | -2.69% | 21.99% | 27.00% | -5.69% | 2.33% | 39.39% | -1.61% | 33.35% | -20.59% | 28.51% |
Fundamentals
CADE:
$7.98B
RF:
$22.99B
CADE:
$2.88
RF:
$2.42
CADE:
14.60
RF:
10.80
CADE:
2.89
RF:
2.42
CADE:
1.31
RF:
1.30
CADE:
$2.75B
RF:
$9.61B
CADE:
$1.36B
RF:
$7.17B
CADE:
$564.17M
RF:
$2.81B
Returns By Period
CADE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RF
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -2.69%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 25.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 17.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CADE vs. RF — Risk / Return Rank
CADE
RF
CADE vs. RF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cadence Bancorporation (CADE) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CADE | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.17 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between CADE and RF is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CADE vs. RF - Dividend Comparison
CADE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than RF's 4.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CADE Cadence Bancorporation | 2.78% | 2.57% | 2.90% | 3.18% | 3.57% | 7.34% | 2.72% | 2.26% | 2.37% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RF Regions Financial Corporation | 4.00% | 5.12% | 4.17% | 4.54% | 3.43% | 2.98% | 3.85% | 3.44% | 3.44% | 1.82% | 1.78% | 2.40% |
Drawdowns
CADE vs. RF - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CADE | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -92.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -14.79% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -31.19% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.31% | — |
Volatility
CADE vs. RF - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CADE | RF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 29.81% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 31.63% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 36.02% | — |
Financials
CADE vs. RF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cadence Bancorporation and Regions Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CADE vs. RF - Profitability Comparison
CADE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cadence Bancorporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 787.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.92B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.8%.
CADE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cadence Bancorporation reported an operating income of 198.70M and revenue of 787.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.2%.
RF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 708.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.4%.
CADE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cadence Bancorporation reported a net income of 146.75M and revenue of 787.17M, resulting in a net margin of 18.6%.
RF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Regions Financial Corporation reported a net income of 534.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 22.2%.