PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HSHP vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HSHP vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HSHP achieves a 71.21% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 244.07% return.


HSHP

1D
3.05%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
71.21%
6M
71.96%
1Y
144.70%
3Y*
44.60%
5Y*
10Y*

MU

1D
-1.43%
1M
22.15%
YTD
244.07%
6M
307.41%
1Y
746.93%
3Y*
144.69%
5Y*
66.21%
10Y*
55.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HSHP vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HSHP
Himalaya Shipping Ltd.
71.21%96.10%-23.53%37.12%-1.99%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
244.07%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-10.93%

Correlation

The correlation between HSHP and MU is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2022

0.17

The correlation between HSHP and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HSHP:

$715.11M

MU:

$1.12T

EPS

HSHP:

$0.63

MU:

$21.26

PE Ratio

HSHP:

24.25

MU:

46.18

PEG Ratio

HSHP:

0.04

MU:

0.17

PS Ratio

HSHP:

4.92

MU:

19.16

PB Ratio

HSHP:

4.59

MU:

15.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

HSHP:

$143.50M

MU:

$58.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HSHP:

$98.40M

MU:

$33.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

HSHP:

$101.44M

MU:

$25.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HSHP vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSHP
HSHP Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
HSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HSHP vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HSHPMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-7.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.78

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.35

24.91

-15.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.19

94.64

-73.44

HSHP vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HSHP Sharpe Ratio is 3.69, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 10.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HSHP and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HSHP vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HSHP drawdown since its inception was -51.51%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSHP and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HSHPMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.51%

-98.25%

+46.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.57%

-30.28%

+14.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.51%

-57.63%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.38%

-9.07%

+3.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.76%

-58.16%

+43.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.85%

7.95%

-1.10%

Volatility

HSHP vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) is 13.10%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 32.86%. This indicates that HSHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HSHPMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.10%

32.86%

-19.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.50%

57.74%

-27.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.51%

69.66%

-30.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.51%

53.18%

-10.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.51%

50.12%

-7.61%

Dividends

HSHP vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

HSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HSHP
Himalaya Shipping Ltd.
3.81%3.57%9.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%

Financials

HSHP vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Himalaya Shipping Ltd. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
33.60M
23.86B
(HSHP) Total Revenue
(MU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HSHP vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Himalaya Shipping Ltd. and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
54.8%
74.4%
Portfolio components
HSHP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported a gross profit of 18.40M and revenue of 33.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.8%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

HSHP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported an operating income of 17.20M and revenue of 33.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.2%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

HSHP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported a net income of 5.00M and revenue of 33.60M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HSHP and MU have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (32.86%) compared to HSHP (13.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSHP dropped -51.51% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs 3.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HSHP and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer